On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 12:53:59PM +0200, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
>
> If the library was replaced with another one (factory-replacement avove),
> are there any chances that the scsi addresses (14 vs 15) in drive
> configuration were swapped? It's also possible you (or someone else at your
> site)
>> I had a similar situation awhile back. I think my st0 corresponded to
>> nst1, st1 didn't have nst equiv. Something like that.
>>
>> I don't know what O/S you're running there? It's obviously different to
>> mine.
>>
>
> its centos5:
> [r...@molbio ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS release
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 05:51:26PM +1100, Glen Davison wrote:
> Michael Galloway wrote on 09/01/2009 09:56:08 AM:
>
> > any help appreciated.
> >
> > -- michael
>
> I had a similar situation awhile back. I think my st0 corresponded to
> nst1, st1 didn't have nst equiv. Something like that.
>
Michael Galloway wrote on 09/01/2009 09:56:08 AM:
> Michael Galloway
>
> to: bacula
>
> 09/01/09 09:58 AM
>
> could i get a sanity check please? i've replaced my spectralogic T50
> (had some hardware issues) and i'm
> rebuilding backup server. i'm working through the basic tape and
> change
could i get a sanity check please? i've replaced my spectralogic T50 (had some
hardware issues) and i'm
rebuilding backup server. i'm working through the basic tape and changer tests.
scsi looks like this:
[r...@molbio bin]# lsscsi
[0:0:0:0]diskATA TOSHIBA MK2035GS DK02 /dev/sda
[
