--- John Drescher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The second server is the same
> >
> > But a third server, with a 130 GB backup, I tried
> to
> > restore 6 hours ago, bconsole says the job is done
> > almost inmediatelly, and I still see no files on
> > /tmp/bacula-restores, whats up?
> >
> Was t
> The second server is the same
>
> But a third server, with a 130 GB backup, I tried to
> restore 6 hours ago, bconsole says the job is done
> almost inmediatelly, and I still see no files on
> /tmp/bacula-restores, whats up?
>
Was this /tmp/bacula-restores on the client or on the machine with the
Again, I backup 5 GB and restores perfectly and
inmediatelly
The second server is the same
But a third server, with a 130 GB backup, I tried to
restore 6 hours ago, bconsole says the job is done
almost inmediatelly, and I still see no files on
/tmp/bacula-restores, whats up?
The configuration i
never mind, since it is a big backup, it took some
time, though I dont like the fact that I see a T
jobstatus and it has not really finished, since the
files are not extracted yet.
Thanks anyways!
btw, I compiled a short while ago with 4 patches, but
now I se 7! should I patch asap? thanks again
btw, the messages command also thinks its all fine and
dandy. :(
*messages
09-nov 08:01 respaldo-dir JobId 7: Start Restore Job
RestoreFiles.2007-11-09_08.01.04
09-nov 08:01 respaldo-dir JobId 7: Using Device
"FileStorage"
09-nov 08:01 respaldo-sd JobId 7: Ready to read from
volume "Default-0013
Hi there, I installed 2.2.5 with all patches included,
and made minor modifications to the default config
scripts to meet my needs.
I simply changed /usr/src/bacula-2.2.5 to /home and
modified schedules for a monmthly cycle instead of
weekly.
I already have 2 bacula servers working perfectly
wel