Re: [Bacula-users] premature recycling

2010-10-24 Thread Dan Langille
On 10/24/2010 7:56 PM, Kleber Leal wrote: > 2010/10/24 Dan Langille mailto:d...@langille.org>> > > On 10/22/2010 11:28 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > > On 10/22/2010 11:40 AM, Martin Simmons wrote: > >>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:08:06 -0400, Dan Langille said: > >>> > >>> On 10

Re: [Bacula-users] premature recycling

2010-10-24 Thread Kleber Leal
Dan, if you set file retention period for 3 years your catalog will grow. I suggest you set file retention period for 3 months (same your previous configuration) and set job retention period for 3 years. Kleber 2010/10/24 Dan Langille > On 10/22/2010 11:28 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > > On 10/22/

Re: [Bacula-users] premature recycling

2010-10-24 Thread Dan Langille
On 10/22/2010 11:28 PM, Dan Langille wrote: > On 10/22/2010 11:40 AM, Martin Simmons wrote: >>> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:08:06 -0400, Dan Langille said: >>> >>> On 10/21/2010 12:10 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:51:51 -0300, Kleber Leal said: > > 2010/10/21 Mar

Re: [Bacula-users] premature recycling

2010-10-22 Thread Dan Langille
On 10/22/2010 11:40 AM, Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:08:06 -0400, Dan Langille said: >> >> On 10/21/2010 12:10 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:51:51 -0300, Kleber Leal said: 2010/10/21 Martin Simmons >> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:3

Re: [Bacula-users] premature recycling

2010-10-22 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:08:06 -0400, Dan Langille said: > > On 10/21/2010 12:10 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: > >> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:51:51 -0300, Kleber Leal said: > >> > >> 2010/10/21 Martin Simmons > >> > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:34:42 -0400, Dan Langille said: > > I'm

Re: [Bacula-users] premature recycling

2010-10-21 Thread Dan Langille
On 10/21/2010 12:10 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:51:51 -0300, Kleber Leal said: >> >> 2010/10/21 Martin Simmons >> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:34:42 -0400, Dan Langille said: I'm getting recycling before retention expires. Or so I think. It may be pos

Re: [Bacula-users] premature recycling

2010-10-21 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:51:51 -0300, Kleber Leal said: > > 2010/10/21 Martin Simmons > > > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:34:42 -0400, Dan Langille said: > > > > > > I'm getting recycling before retention expires. Or so I think. It may be > > > possible that the Pools definitions are out of

Re: [Bacula-users] premature recycling

2010-10-21 Thread Kleber Leal
He is not confused. I think. The bacula should not to recycle a volume, even if there is not appendable volumes*. *The manual says: *"**The Volume Retention record defines the length of time that Bacula will guarantee that the Volume is not reused** counting from the time the last job stored on the

Re: [Bacula-users] premature recycling

2010-10-21 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:34:42 -0400, Dan Langille said: > > I'm getting recycling before retention expires. Or so I think. It may be > possible that the Pools definitions are out of date, but before I run an > update command, I wanted to see if anyone saw something out of order here. > > T

[Bacula-users] premature recycling

2010-10-20 Thread Dan Langille
I'm getting recycling before retention expires. Or so I think. It may be possible that the Pools definitions are out of date, but before I run an update command, I wanted to see if anyone saw something out of order here. This is the Volume before it was recycled: Pool: FullsFile | mediaid | vol