Re: [Bacula-users] performance problems backing up ocfs2 clusters

2009-03-16 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, thanks for your suggestions, I tried your tar suggestion and indeed it turns out that transfer rates drop to the dozens of kb/sec in one special directory stored on the ocfs2 filesystem. I'm now in contact with the ocfs2 devs on the users list to see if they have any suggestions. All

Re: [Bacula-users] performance problems backing up ocfs2 clusters

2009-03-04 Thread Thomas Mueller
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:24:22 +0100, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > Hello folks, > > we're experiencing massive problems backing up an ocfs2 cluster > filesystem mounted on SLES 10 SP2 machines located on a shared SAN > storage). The cluster has 8 members, and we've already tried certain > mount options

[Bacula-users] performance problems backing up ocfs2 clusters

2009-03-04 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hello folks, we're experiencing massive problems backing up an ocfs2 cluster filesystem mounted on SLES 10 SP2 machines located on a shared SAN storage). The cluster has 8 members, and we've already tried certain mount options (noatime et al.) in an attempt to improve performance, however bacula's