Re: [Bacula-users] No bacula volume is mounted, but the volume is in use on the same device

2010-01-06 Thread Javier Barroso
Hi again, On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Javier Barroso wrote: > Hi, > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Javier Barroso wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:18 PM, John Drescher wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Javier Barroso >>> wrote: Hi people, First, I'm using an

Re: [Bacula-users] No bacula volume is mounted, but the volume is in use on the same device

2010-01-06 Thread Javier Barroso
Hi, On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Javier Barroso wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:18 PM, John Drescher wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Javier Barroso wrote: >>> Hi people, >>> >>> First, I'm using an old bacula version (etch version 1.38.11-8), so I >>> now this is a 2006 question

Re: [Bacula-users] No bacula volume is mounted, but the volume is in use on the same device

2010-01-05 Thread Javier Barroso
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:18 PM, John Drescher wrote: > On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Javier Barroso wrote: >> Hi people, >> >> First, I'm using an old bacula version (etch version 1.38.11-8), so I >> now this is a 2006 question :( ... >> # mtx -f /dev/autochanger1 load 4 0 >> * mount >> * stat

Re: [Bacula-users] No bacula volume is mounted, but the volume is in use on the same device

2010-01-05 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Javier Barroso wrote: > Hi people, > > First, I'm using an old bacula version (etch version 1.38.11-8), so I > now this is a 2006 question :( > > I have a problem, I searched in this list and your bugtracker, but I > couldn't find any response which solve my issue.

[Bacula-users] No bacula volume is mounted, but the volume is in use on the same device

2010-01-05 Thread Javier Barroso
Hi people, First, I'm using an old bacula version (etch version 1.38.11-8), so I now this is a 2006 question :( I have a problem, I searched in this list and your bugtracker, but I couldn't find any response which solve my issue. Today, after recover from an autochanger issue (see thread about s

Re: [Bacula-users] no Bacula volume is mounted

2005-04-15 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi. Tom Morgan wrote: ... What I ended up doing is deleting the VolumeName mp0006 from the db and relabeling it now it is working. Looks as if I am going to have to do that to all the tapes :( In that case you should seriously try to find the reasons for this behaviour - provided you really wan

Re: [Bacula-users] no Bacula volume is mounted

2005-04-15 Thread Tom Morgan
Arno Lehmann wrote: Hi. I'll only suggest what to try to check if your tapes are ok for bacula. Tom Morgan wrote: ...lots of stuff snipped 15-Apr 09:17 drakul-sd: Please mount Volume "mp0008" on Storage Device "Sun L280" for Job hella.2005-04-15_01.05.06 15-Apr 09:19 drakul-sd: hella.2005-04-15_0

Re: [Bacula-users] no Bacula volume is mounted

2005-04-15 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi. I'll only suggest what to try to check if your tapes are ok for bacula. Tom Morgan wrote: ...lots of stuff snipped 15-Apr 09:17 drakul-sd: Please mount Volume "mp0008" on Storage Device "Sun L280" for Job hella.2005-04-15_01.05.06 15-Apr 09:19 drakul-sd: hella.2005-04-15_01.05.06 Fatal error:

[Bacula-users] no Bacula volume is mounted

2005-04-15 Thread Tom Morgan
Ok so I am at my wits end here... This is the error msg I recieved this morning after I received a: 15-Apr 05:04 drakul-sd: Please mount Volume "mp0008" on Storage Device "Sun L280" for Job hella.2005-04-15_01.05.06 The problem is that mp0008 doesnt exsist and I have been lazy changing bacul