Re: [Bacula-users] natted bacula server

2006-02-04 Thread Phil Stracchino
Dave wrote: > Hi Phil, >Thanks for your reply. I was planning on using tls for encryption. > Given that it seems as if stunnel would be doing double duty encrypting > the tunnel. Do you have a similar setup? No, I'm not backing up any remote clients at this time. Nor do I have plans to do so

Re: [Bacula-users] natted bacula server

2006-02-04 Thread Dave
]> To: Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 5:04 PM Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] natted bacula server Dave wrote: Hello, I'm trying to implement cross-internet bacula backups. And i'm trying to keep this as simple as i can. All servers and clients are running freebsd and bacula 1.38.

Re: [Bacula-users] natted bacula server

2006-02-04 Thread Phil Stracchino
Dave wrote: > Hello, >I'm trying to implement cross-internet bacula backups. And i'm trying > to keep this as simple as i can. All servers and clients are running > freebsd and bacula 1.38.5 via ports. On the client box which has a > public IP address i've got bacula-fd running and port 9102 op

[Bacula-users] natted bacula server

2006-02-04 Thread Dave
Hello, I'm trying to implement cross-internet bacula backups. And i'm trying to keep this as simple as i can. All servers and clients are running freebsd and bacula 1.38.5 via ports. On the client box which has a public IP address i've got bacula-fd running and port 9102 open from the firewa