On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:27:30PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've read this thread, and I'd want to get some clarification about this
> topic.
>
> if Julien have set the Volume Retention of incremental in 35 days, I don't
> understand why "(around 15 june Incr-0001 should be rec
Hi Folks,
I've read this thread, and I'd want to get some clarification about this
topic.
if Julien have set the Volume Retention of incremental in 35 days, I don't
understand why "(around 15 june Incr-0001 should be recycled)".
2) is it correct that on 1 july Full-0001 it's recycled? if Volume
R
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 20:52 -0400, mo...@frakir.org wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:25:55PM +0200, Julien Cigar wrote:
>
> > > 1 may 0:00 am : Full backup -> volume "Full-0001"
> > > 1 may 8:00 pm : Incremental backup -> volume "Incr-0001"
> > > 2 may 8:00 pm : Incremental backup -> volume "In
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 09:25:55PM +0200, Julien Cigar wrote:
> > 1 may 0:00 am : Full backup -> volume "Full-0001"
> > 1 may 8:00 pm : Incremental backup -> volume "Incr-0001"
> > 2 may 8:00 pm : Incremental backup -> volume "Incr-0002"
> > 3 may 8:00 pm : Incremental backup -> volume "Incr-0003"
Sorry to insist .. but no one on this ? is it an error in the Bacula
manual ?
thanks
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 12:40 +0200, Julien Cigar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the Bacula manual I read that :
>
> "However, one must keep in mind that if your Volume Retention period is
> too short, it may prune the l
Hello,
In the Bacula manual I read that :
"However, one must keep in mind that if your Volume Retention period is
too short, it may prune the last valid Full backup, and hence until the
next Full backup is done, you will not have a complete backup of your
system, and in addition, the next Increme