Re: [Bacula-users] low despooling speeds when parallelism is increased

2010-06-08 Thread Athanasios Douitsis
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:29:44AM -0400, Bob Hetzel wrote: > What CPU's do you have in your 2950? I'm backing up to two LTO-2 in my > PowerEdge 2900 server (dual Xeon 5160 CPU's) and it seems to be pretty > maxed out with two tape drives. On my R710 I only get 70MB/sec despool > rates to LTO

Re: [Bacula-users] low despooling speeds when parallelism is increased

2010-06-02 Thread Bob Hetzel
What CPU's do you have in your 2950? I'm backing up to two LTO-2 in my PowerEdge 2900 server (dual Xeon 5160 CPU's) and it seems to be pretty maxed out with two tape drives. On my R710 I only get 70MB/sec despool rates to LTO-4 drives. If you can't get higher results when using a SAN I'd thin

Re: [Bacula-users] low despooling speeds when parallelism is increased

2010-06-02 Thread Ralf Gross
Athanasios Douitsis schrieb: > Tuning it down to 3+3 (from the original 6+6) seems to alleviate but not > solve the problem completely. I totaly agree with your suggestion, from > this point onwards it seems to be a case of finding a spooling setup > with enough I/O oomph. > > One question howeve

Re: [Bacula-users] low despooling speeds when parallelism is increased

2010-06-02 Thread John Drescher
> If you really need to run so many jobs concurrently put as many fast > disks in the server as possible and configure them as RAID10. Or raid 0. No need for redundancy on an array that is essentially a cache. I use a 4 drive raid 0 for my bacula spool. > Maybe > use SSD's instead of SATA/SAS Dis

Re: [Bacula-users] low despooling speeds when parallelism is increased

2010-06-02 Thread Athanasios Douitsis
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 12:11:57PM +0200, Ralf Gross wrote: > > I've had the same problem. First I started with a simple 2 Disk RAID1 > as spool area for our 3 LTO-4 drives. With more jobs running in > parallel this was simply not enought. In the end I put 6 WD Raptor > SATA drives in the server,

Re: [Bacula-users] low despooling speeds when parallelism is increased

2010-06-02 Thread Ralf Gross
Athanasios Douitsis schrieb: > > Hi everyone, > > Our setup consists of a Dell 2950 server (PERC6i) w/ FreeBSD7 and two HP > Ultrium LTO4 drives installed in a twin Quantum autochanger enclosure. > Our bacula version is 5.0.0 (which is the current FreeBSD port version). > > Here is our problem

[Bacula-users] low despooling speeds when parallelism is increased

2010-06-02 Thread Athanasios Douitsis
Hi everyone, Our setup consists of a Dell 2950 server (PERC6i) w/ FreeBSD7 and two HP Ultrium LTO4 drives installed in a twin Quantum autochanger enclosure. Our bacula version is 5.0.0 (which is the current FreeBSD port version). Here is our problem: When running a single job, our setup is ab