Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals use 170GB on-disk volume storage, but only 60GB when restored

2018-07-10 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 06:53:08PM +0100, Martin Simmons wrote: > Maybe your fileset causes files to be copied more than once (e.g. by listing > the same directory via different File= lines)? > > Also, what kind of filesystem are you using for the restored directory? Maybe > it is compressing the

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals use 170GB on-disk volume storage, but only 60GB when restored

2018-07-06 Thread Martin Simmons
Maybe your fileset causes files to be copied more than once (e.g. by listing the same directory via different File= lines)? Also, what kind of filesystem are you using for the restored directory? Maybe it is compressing the data on restore (since du reports the disk used, not the size of the file

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals use 170GB on-disk volume storage, but only 60GB when restored

2018-07-05 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Dear Olivier, thanks for your reply. On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 08:35:45AM +0200, Olivier Delestre wrote: > Do you use the Aligned plugin for the SD ? >  I do not know about your mystery > keep us in touch We're not using any plugins, just a plain bacula install compiled from source. Our online vo

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals use 170GB on-disk volume storage, but only 60GB when restored

2018-07-05 Thread Olivier Delestre
Thanks for your experience. I install a 3th server yesterday with repo of bacula 9.0.8 + Postgresql on Ubuntu 18 Lts ( Not CentOs have pb of rpm at start. Yet ?? ). With a Pool Zfs ( comp =lz4 , dedup on ) I will test during the holidays with client ( 7.4.7 ). The other server is production

[Bacula-users] Incrementals use 170GB on-disk volume storage, but only 60GB when restored

2018-07-05 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Dear bacula list, I'm having a weird problem with incremental backups of one of our machines. We do an online (to disk backup) compressed incremental backup into single volumes (one volume per incremental job, 10 volumes recycled automatically) and everything appears to work fine. However, the o

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals not happening

2015-07-07 Thread James Chamberlain
ntirely sure myself and > it’s hard to find in the manual, but I think the default unit is seconds. > > > > From: James Chamberlain [mailto:jam...@exa.com] > Sent: 07 July 2015 1:11 > To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Bacula-users] Incrementals not happeni

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals not happening

2015-07-06 Thread Luc Van der Veken
07 July 2015 1:11 To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Bacula-users] Incrementals not happening Hi all, I'm trying to figure out what's wrong with my configuration. If run a full backup on the system Hawking, and then try to run an incremental against Hawking, the job get

[Bacula-users] Incrementals not happening

2015-07-06 Thread James Chamberlain
Hi all,I'm trying to figure out what's wrong with my configuration.  If run a full backup on the system Hawking, and then try to run an incremental against Hawking, the job gets promoted to full and I don't know why.  If I do a restore against Hawking, the most recent full backup is found and Bacul

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals upgraded to fulls

2007-04-24 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kyle Tucker wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:48:36PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: >>> Did you change the FileSet? >> Or do you have separate jobs for he different levels? > > Yes, they are different jobs so I can use different schedules > and differe

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals upgraded to fulls

2007-04-24 Thread Kyle Tucker
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:48:36PM +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote: > > > Did you change the FileSet? > > Or do you have separate jobs for he different levels? Yes, they are different jobs so I can use different schedules and different Jobdefs, where the levels are defined. Also, some further reading

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals upgraded to fulls

2007-04-24 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 4/24/2007 12:40 PM, Ralf Gross wrote: > Kyle Tucker schrieb: >> On my newly refreshed 2.0.2 Bacula installation, >> I ran fulls on all my clients initially. Last night the >> daily incrementals ran and all clients were upgraded to >> full as Bacula determined their was no previous f

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals upgraded to fulls

2007-04-24 Thread Ralf Gross
Kyle Tucker schrieb: > On my newly refreshed 2.0.2 Bacula installation, > I ran fulls on all my clients initially. Last night the > daily incrementals ran and all clients were upgraded to > full as Bacula determined their was no previous full in > the catalog for those clients, despite them a

[Bacula-users] Incrementals upgraded to fulls

2007-04-24 Thread Kyle Tucker
Hi, On my newly refreshed 2.0.2 Bacula installation, I ran fulls on all my clients initially. Last night the daily incrementals ran and all clients were upgraded to full as Bacula determined their was no previous full in the catalog for those clients, despite them all using the same FileSe

Re: [Bacula-users] incrementals

2007-03-12 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 10:06:30 -0400, Bill Szkotnicki said: > > Hi, > I am backing up /home on one server to file storage on another. > I would like a "full" to happen 4 times a year and incrementals every > other day so I set up the following schedule: > Schedule { > Name = "homesched" >

[Bacula-users] incrementals

2007-03-12 Thread Bill Szkotnicki
Hi, I am backing up /home on one server to file storage on another. I would like a "full" to happen 4 times a year and incrementals every other day so I set up the following schedule: Schedule { Name = "homesched" Run = Fullon 1 jan apr jul oct at 18:05 Run = Incremental daily at 1:05 }

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals are upgraded to Full

2005-05-09 Thread Sven Carstens
Am Montag, 9. Mai 2005 16:22 schrieb Jeffrey L. Taylor: > I am new to Bacula so consider this an idea to look at, not a > definitive answer to do. If this were my problem, I'd look at the > retention of jobs. If the last full backup is purged before doing the > last incremental in the week, I wou

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals are upgraded to Full

2005-05-09 Thread Alan Brown
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Jeffrey L. Taylor wrote: I am new to Bacula so consider this an idea to look at, not a definitive answer to do. If this were my problem, I'd look at the retention of jobs. If the last full backup is purged before doing the last incremental in the week, I would expect the incre

Re: [Bacula-users] Incrementals are upgraded to Full

2005-05-09 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting Sven Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi List, > > every now and then my Incremental-Jobs are upgraded to Full. > Very annoying as the Pool for the Incremental-Jobs is not as > big as the one for Full. [snip] I am new to Bacula so consider this an idea to look at, not a definitive answer t

[Bacula-users] Incrementals are upgraded to Full

2005-05-09 Thread Sven Carstens
Hi List, every now and then my Incremental-Jobs are upgraded to Full. Very annoying as the Pool for the Incremental-Jobs is not as big as the one for Full. And of course: no changes to the filesets(no changes to bacula at all) Every Friday Morning 0100h Full (to be taken off site). Every other da