Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backup of hard links

2008-01-16 Thread C M Reinehr
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 11:37, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > * Ingo Jochim schrieb am 16.01.08 um 17:39 Uhr: > > [...] > > > Good idea. > > So what is important for the backup? ctime or mtime? > > Both. But you can configure bacula to ignore the ctime. See Configuring the Director/The Job Resourc

Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backup of hard links

2008-01-16 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 17:39:58 +0100, Ingo Jochim said: > > C M Reinehr schrieb: > > On Wednesday 16 January 2008 09:49, Ingo Jochim wrote: > > > >> C M Reinehr schrieb: > >> > >>> On Wednesday 16 January 2008 08:54, Ingo Jochim wrote: > >>> > Dan Langille schrieb: >

Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backup of hard links

2008-01-16 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Ingo Jochim schrieb am 16.01.08 um 17:39 Uhr: [...] > > Good idea. > So what is important for the backup? ctime or mtime? Both. But you can configure bacula to ignore the ctime. -Marc > I't not able to reset the ctime. > How can I have ls give me the time format I will need for touch to res

Re: [Bacula-users] incremental backup of hard links

2008-01-16 Thread Dan Langille
Ingo Jochim wrote: > I create hard links for the files I want to backup so that while I do > the backup the files can get deleted by someone else. > > The problem is that on an incremental backup I get a backup of all the > files again like I got on a full backup. > I create all the hard links r

[Bacula-users] incremental backup of hard links

2008-01-16 Thread Ingo Jochim
I create hard links for the files I want to backup so that while I do the backup the files can get deleted by someone else. The problem is that on an incremental backup I get a backup of all the files again like I got on a full backup. I create all the hard links right before the backup. A hard