Josh Fisher schrieb:
> The only difference that I can see is that the full_write() /
> safe_write() functions in tar attempt the write multiple times if need
> be and attempt to finish (it seems) partial writes. Btape fails
> immediately if the write() system call fails to write the requested
>
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
>> Curious as to why tar worked when btape did not, I found this. For
>> portability reasons, tar appears to always use a physical block size of
>> 512 bytes. See
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_section/tar_73.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Curious as to why tar worked when btape did not, I found this. For
> portability reasons, tar appears to always use a physical block size of
> 512 bytes. See
> http://www.gnu.org/software/tar/manual/html_section/tar_73.html. Perhaps
> that explains
Hi,
25.10.2007 16:34,, Christoph Litauer wrote::
> Christoph Litauer schrieb:
>> Josh Fisher schrieb:
>>> This can happen when ClearPageReserved() is not called for a reserved
>>> kernel memory page. Could be an iSCSI driver (included with the Linux
>>> kernel) problem or, if you are using a hard
Christoph Litauer wrote:
> Christoph Litauer schrieb:
>
>> Josh Fisher schrieb:
>>
>>> This can happen when ClearPageReserved() is not called for a reserved
>>> kernel memory page. Could be an iSCSI driver (included with the Linux
>>> kernel) problem or, if you are using a hardware iSCSI
Christoph Litauer schrieb:
> Josh Fisher schrieb:
>> This can happen when ClearPageReserved() is not called for a reserved
>> kernel memory page. Could be an iSCSI driver (included with the Linux
>> kernel) problem or, if you are using a hardware iSCSI adapter, it could
>> be a problem with its dr
Josh Fisher schrieb:
>
> This can happen when ClearPageReserved() is not called for a reserved
> kernel memory page. Could be an iSCSI driver (included with the Linux
> kernel) problem or, if you are using a hardware iSCSI adapter, it could
> be a problem with its driver.
>
>> My question is: Wh
Christoph Litauer wrote:
> Dear bacula users,
>
> I am running bacula-mysql 2.2.5 (rpm from sourceforge) on a SuSE SLES
> 10SP1 machine, kernel version 2.6.16 (SMP).
>
> I configured and mounted tape drive via iSCSI. I can tar from and to
> this drive without problems. I can label a tape with btap
Dear bacula users,
I am running bacula-mysql 2.2.5 (rpm from sourceforge) on a SuSE SLES
10SP1 machine, kernel version 2.6.16 (SMP).
I configured and mounted tape drive via iSCSI. I can tar from and to
this drive without problems. I can label a tape with btape, read this
label without problems. B
