On Wednesday 24 August 2005 16:54, Alan Brown wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Timo Eissler wrote:
> > I don´t want to read 68 short emails every day. I think it is better to
> > have 2 long emails in which all clients of these job are, but
> > this is not my main problem.
>
> I'd like this as well, a
Hi,
Alan Brown wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Timo Eissler wrote:
I don´t want to read 68 short emails every day. I think it is better
to have 2 long emails in which all clients of these job are, but
this is not my main problem.
I'd like this as well, and I'm sure a lot of admins with lots o
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Timo Eissler wrote:
I don´t want to read 68 short emails every day. I think it is better to have
2 long emails in which all clients of these job are, but
this is not my main problem.
I'd like this as well, and I'm sure a lot of admins with lots of jobs have
the same issu
Phil Stracchino schrieb:
Timo Eissler wrote:
Hello,
we have 68 jobs, with 34 clients. In other Backup programs i used before
i switched to bacula i had 2 jobs
with these 34 clients. Now every client must have it´s own job.
I don´t want to read 68 short emails every day. I think it is bette
Timo Eissler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have 68 jobs, with 34 clients. In other Backup programs i used before
> i switched to bacula i had 2 jobs
> with these 34 clients. Now every client must have it´s own job.
>
> I don´t want to read 68 short emails every day. I think it is better to
> have 2 long
Hello,
we have 68 jobs, with 34 clients. In other Backup programs i used before
i switched to bacula i had 2 jobs
with these 34 clients. Now every client must have it´s own job.
I don´t want to read 68 short emails every day. I think it is better to
have 2 long emails in which all clients of
