Re: [Bacula-users] full -> tape, incremental -> disk

2005-07-20 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, Adrian Close wrote: On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Arno Lehmann wrote: This might give problems with job promotion, I try to avoid that by starting the affected backups by hand. Yeah. So, my problem now becomes that promoted incrementals want to use the storage device defined in the job overrid

Re: [Bacula-users] full -> tape, incremental -> disk

2005-07-19 Thread Adrian Close
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005, Arno Lehmann wrote: You need to tell bacula which storage device to use. You can do this in the schedule with a job override. Right - thanks. :) This might give problems with job promotion, I try to avoid that by starting the affected backups by hand. Yeah. So, my pr

Re: [Bacula-users] full -> tape, incremental -> disk

2005-07-19 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, Adrian Close wrote: Hi all, So, I was hoping to take advantage of the directives allowing for the use of different pools for full/differential/incremental backups, and put full backups on tape, but differential/incrementals on disk. For example: Pool = Windows-Full

[Bacula-users] full -> tape, incremental -> disk

2005-07-18 Thread Adrian Close
Hi all, So, I was hoping to take advantage of the directives allowing for the use of different pools for full/differential/incremental backups, and put full backups on tape, but differential/incrementals on disk. For example: Pool = Windows-Full Full Backup Pool = Windows-Ful