>> >
>> > I'm often seeing this kind of warnings in Bacula 3.0. They don't
>> > affect backups being successful, but are just a bit annoying. I
>> > wonder should they really be there (and if so, what are they useful
>> > for?) or is it some leftover of developing-debugging? :)
>>
>> this is nor
On Friday 24 April 2009 14:54:12 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:26:04 +0300, Silver Salonen wrote:
>
> > Hi.
> >
> > I'm often seeing this kind of warnings in Bacula 3.0. They don't affect
> > backups being successful, but are just a bit annoying. I wonder should
> > they really b
On Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:26:04 +0300, Silver Salonen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm often seeing this kind of warnings in Bacula 3.0. They don't affect
> backups being successful, but are just a bit annoying. I wonder should
> they really be there (and if so, what are they useful for?) or is it
> some leftov
Hi.
I'm often seeing this kind of warnings in Bacula 3.0. They don't affect
backups being successful, but are just a bit annoying. I wonder should they
really be there (and if so, what are they useful for?) or is it some leftover
of developing-debugging? :)
...
17-Apr 23:06 backup-sd JobId 457
