Re: [Bacula-users] file signatures PKI vs FileSet

2012-09-29 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2012/9/28 > > >> - The FileSet signature (md5/sha) is used to compare (at Bacula SD?) > >> if the data read are unaltered regarding the hash value stored in the > >> database > >> > > > > I think fileset signature is not used during restore. :) I can't > > find appropriate code in extract

Re: [Bacula-users] file signatures PKI vs FileSet

2012-09-28 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von Radosław Korzeniewski : > Hello, > > 2012/9/28 >> >> - PKI Signature ensures that the client FD can verify on restore that >> the data are actually saved by itself signed with the private key >> > > Correct. > > >> - PKI Encryption ensures that no one without any of the private keys >>

Re: [Bacula-users] file signatures PKI vs FileSet

2012-09-28 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, 2012/9/28 > > - PKI Signature ensures that the client FD can verify on restore that > the data are actually saved by itself signed with the private key > Correct. > - PKI Encryption ensures that no one without any of the private keys > used at backup time can read the data > And Master

Re: [Bacula-users] file signatures PKI vs FileSet

2012-09-28 Thread lst_hoe02
Zitat von lst_ho...@kwsoft.de: > Hello > > i wonder which of the cryptographic signatures is used and how if i > specify in the FileSet option "signature=md5" and on the client FD > config "PKI Signatures=yes". In the manual is stated that the "PKI > Signatures" is not configurable but uses SHA-2

[Bacula-users] file signatures PKI vs FileSet

2012-09-27 Thread lst_hoe02
Hello i wonder which of the cryptographic signatures is used and how if i specify in the FileSet option "signature=md5" and on the client FD config "PKI Signatures=yes". In the manual is stated that the "PKI Signatures" is not configurable but uses SHA-2 if available, otherwise SHA-1. This