Re: [Bacula-users] dependency resolution issues installing 3.0.2

2009-12-03 Thread Josh Fisher
Paul Binkley wrote: > ... > Is the problem that Bacula is 32 bit and these dependencies are x64? How can > I get around this? > > Thanks! > > BTW, The host machine is Fedora 11 x64. I have been running Bacula 2.4.4 on > this machine without issue for months but need to upgrade > I've been runn

Re: [Bacula-users] dependency resolution issues installing 3.0.2

2009-12-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, 02.12.2009 19:27, Paul Binkley wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Has anyone seen this dependency error before, and if so, what am I doing > wrong? > > libpython2.5.so.1.0 is needed by package Bacula-sqlite-3.0.2-1.i386 > (/Bacula-sqlite-3.0.2-1.fc10.i386) > libcrypto.so.7 is needed by package Bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] dependency resolution issues installing 3.0.2

2009-12-02 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Binkley wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Has anyone seen this dependency error before, and if so, what am I doing > wrong? > > libpython2.5.so.1.0 is needed by package Bacula-sqlite-3.0.2-1.i386 > (/Bacula-sqlite-3.0.2-1.fc10.i386) > libcrypto.so.7 is nee

[Bacula-users] dependency resolution issues installing 3.0.2

2009-12-02 Thread Paul Binkley
Hi Folks, Has anyone seen this dependency error before, and if so, what am I doing wrong? libpython2.5.so.1.0 is needed by package Bacula-sqlite-3.0.2-1.i386 (/Bacula-sqlite-3.0.2-1.fc10.i386) libcrypto.so.7 is needed by package Bacula-sqlite-3.0.2-1.i386 (/Bacula-sqlite-3.0.2-1.fc10.i386) libssl