Re: [Bacula-users] correct strategy for mysql innodb and myisam backup

2017-01-12 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Thursday 2017-01-12 17:21:05 Alan Brown wrote: > On 12/01/17 14:14, Josip Deanovic wrote: > > So if one is for some reason locked to specific old version of a > > specific old proprietary application one can't do much than continue > > with the MyISAM as innodb is not an option and external sear

Re: [Bacula-users] correct strategy for mysql innodb and myisam backup

2017-01-12 Thread Alan Brown
On 12/01/17 14:14, Josip Deanovic wrote: > So if one is for some reason locked to specific old version of a > specific old proprietary application one can't do much than continue > with the MyISAM as innodb is not an option and external search engines > are not supported either. I've had to deal w

Re: [Bacula-users] correct strategy for mysql innodb and myisam backup

2017-01-12 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Thursday 2017-01-12 08:36:53 Phil Stracchino wrote: > Most applications that "require" MyISAM "require" it for no good reason, > or depend on features that have historically been supported only by > MyISAM but are now supported in InnoDB in current MySQL releases. It > bears case-by-case examin

Re: [Bacula-users] correct strategy for mysql innodb and myisam backup

2017-01-12 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 01/12/17 00:22, Josip Deanovic wrote: > On Wednesday 2017-01-11 17:43:42 Phil Stracchino wrote: > [...] >> The truth is, MyISAM pretty much sucks and you shouldn't be using it in >> production any more. Remember that MyISAM is a 20-year-old storage >> engine, one of whose primary design criteri

Re: [Bacula-users] correct strategy for mysql innodb and myisam backup

2017-01-11 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Wednesday 2017-01-11 17:43:42 Phil Stracchino wrote: [...] > The truth is, MyISAM pretty much sucks and you shouldn't be using it in > production any more. Remember that MyISAM is a 20-year-old storage > engine, one of whose primary design criteria was that it needed to work > *acceptably well*

Re: [Bacula-users] correct strategy for mysql innodb and myisam backup

2017-01-11 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 01/11/17 17:43, Phil Stracchino wrote: > > You may want to use 2 if there are no InnoDB tables *outside of the > MySQL schema*, because in most ...oops. That paragraph was meant to continue: "..in most cases, the MyISAM tables inside the mysql schema change only rarely and you are unlikely t

Re: [Bacula-users] correct strategy for mysql innodb and myisam backup

2017-01-11 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 01/11/17 16:57, scar wrote: > i have been using the script at [1] but then i noticed that the > incremental backups were quite large and containing some MYD and MYI > files. so i realized these were myisam databases. i read that the best > way to backup both innodb and myisam databases was

[Bacula-users] correct strategy for mysql innodb and myisam backup

2017-01-11 Thread scar
i have been using the script at [1] but then i noticed that the incremental backups were quite large and containing some MYD and MYI files. so i realized these were myisam databases. i read that the best way to backup both innodb and myisam databases was to use the mysqldump option --lock-tab