Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

] Sent: 13 May 2015 18:13 To: Ian Young; Radosław Korzeniewski Cc: bacula-users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials   We have never had any version of

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

it’s an intranet reporting server with only little activity. From: Ana Emília M. Arruda [mailto:emiliaarr...@gmail.com] Sent: 18 May 2015 15:14 To: Luc Van der Veken Cc: bacula-users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials Hello Luc, I think there is a misunderstooding here.

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

com] > *Sent:* 13 May 2015 18:13 > *To:* Ian Young; Radosław Korzeniewski > *Cc:* bacula-users > *Subject:* Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials > > > > > We have never had any version of Bacula in which Differential backups were > incomplete. Running wi

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

force everyone who wants to add Windows clients to an existing configuration, to upgrade his dir and SD to 7.0.5. From: Kern Sibbald [mailto:k...@sibbald.com] Sent: 13 May 2015 18:13 To: Ian Young; Radosław Korzeniewski Cc: bacula-users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

On 13.05.2015 18:45, Ian Young wrote: On 13 May 2015, at 17:13, Kern Sibbald wrote: We have never had any version of Bacula in which Differen

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

> On 13 May 2015, at 17:38, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote: > > ​You should compare the job 9938 with the last full backup and not the > incremental one. Radoslaw explained that in the second post in this thread. The files in that last incremental were not present in the previous full dump.

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

> On 13 May 2015, at 17:13, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > We have never had any version of Bacula in which Differential backups were > incomplete. That's really good to know, thanks for the confirmation. > Running with a FD that is more recent that the Dir and the SD or a Dir and SD > that are not

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

Hello Ian, On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Ian Young wrote: > > On 13 May 2015, at 07:20, Radosław Korzeniewski > wrote: > > I appear to be seeing the same problem with CentOS 6 / CentOS 6 >> combinations: >> >> > OS versions doesn't matter. What is important: Bacula Dir/SD vs. File > Daemon

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

We have never had any version of Bacula in which Differential backups were incomplete.  Running with a FD that is more recent that the Dir and the SD or a Dir and SD that are not identical is a big problem.  Until that is fixed it doesn't make much sense to

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

> On 13 May 2015, at 07:20, Radosław Korzeniewski > wrote: > > I appear to be seeing the same problem with CentOS 6 / CentOS 6 combinations: > > > OS versions doesn't matter. What is important: Bacula Dir/SD vs. File Daemon > versions. The supported configuration require Dir/SD in the same v

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

Hello, 2015-05-12 10:25 GMT+02:00 Ian Young : > >> The director is running on a CentOS 6 system and claims to be Bacula >> 5.0.0. The client is CentOS 7 and Bacula 5.2.x, but looking at the jobs for >> other systems they also seem to have inconsistencies like this. >> > > It is unsupported config

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

> On 12 May 2015, at 10:09, Alex Domoradov wrote: > > I'm using 5.2.13 on CentOS 6 form the following repo - > https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ > without any problem. > So you could try it. Thanks for the pointer.

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

> so it should be relatively easy to build a new CentOS 7 machine to get 5.2.13. I'm using 5.2.13 on CentOS 6 form the following repo - https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/slaanesh/bacula/ without any problem. So you could try it. > On 12 May 2015, at 07:33, Radosław Korzeniewski > wrote: > >

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

> On 12 May 2015, at 07:33, Radosław Korzeniewski > wrote: > > why does the subsequent differential not appear to include any of them, given > that it's supposed to be backing up everything changed since the last full > dump (in my case, on 2015-04-19) ? > > Well, it should. A differential b

Re: [Bacula-users] confused about differentials

Hello, 2015-05-10 17:38 GMT+02:00 Ian Young : > I've been using Bacula for quite a few years, and it has helped me dig > myself out of the occasional problem. Today I'm recovering from a more > serious problem and I find that some of the files I'm trying to restore > don't get restored. > > Among

[Bacula-users] confused about differentials

I've been using Bacula for quite a few years, and it has helped me dig myself out of the occasional problem. Today I'm recovering from a more serious problem and I find that some of the files I'm trying to restore don't get restored. Amongst other things, I'm confused by the following from "list