Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-13 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This question has been asked in the last week or two (please check the archives) and is well explained in the manual. Stéphane Lardier wrote: > hi, > is it possible (and does have sense) to run concurrent jobs on a tape ? > no risks of corruption of d

[Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-13 Thread Stéphane Lardier
hi, is it possible (and does have sense) to run concurrent jobs on a tape ? no risks of corruption of datas ? thanks for your tips - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote: > No, I think you're absolutely right - job concurrency without spooling > is not exactly recommended. Rightfully so, in my opinion, because you'd > really have a bad performance when restoring. > > Due to that fact, I suppose noone ever tested it. I tested

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread Alan Brown
On Fri, 2 Mar 2007, Michel Meyers wrote: > Wasn't there a difference between 'Concurrent with spooling' and 'really > concurrent as in interlaced'? Yes. > I seem to recall something as if the > latter wasn't tested/recommended It's fine to lay data to tape using concurrent/interlaced, however

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 02 March 2007 16:54, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/2/2007 4:33 PM, Michel Meyers wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > John Drescher wrote: > >>On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>hi, > >>>is it possible (and does have sense) to

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread John Drescher
> No, I think you're absolutely right - job concurrency without spooling > is not exactly recommended. Rightfully so, in my opinion, because you'd > really have a bad performance when restoring. > > Due to that fact, I suppose noone ever tested it. > > With spooling, concurrent jobs to tape work fi

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, On 3/2/2007 4:33 PM, Michel Meyers wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > John Drescher wrote: > >>On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>hi, >>>is it possible (and does have sense) to run concurrent jobs on a tape ? >>>no risks of corruption of da

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread Stéphane Lardier
John Drescher a écrit : >> and grep in my configuration files give: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# fgrep -i concurrent /etc/bacula/*.conf >> /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf: Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 4 >> /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf: Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 20 >> /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf: Maximum C

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread John Drescher
> and grep in my configuration files give: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] root]# fgrep -i concurrent /etc/bacula/*.conf > /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf: Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 4 > /etc/bacula/bacula-fd.conf: Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 20 > /etc/bacula/bacula-sd.conf: Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 20 > Have yo

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread Stéphane Lardier
John Drescher a écrit : > On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> John Drescher a écrit : >>> On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, is it possible (and does have sense) to run concurrent jobs on a tape ? no risks of corruption of datas ? th

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Drescher wrote: > On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> hi, >> is it possible (and does have sense) to run concurrent jobs on a tape ? >> no risks of corruption of datas ? >> thanks for your tips >> > > No this works very well

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread John Drescher
On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > John Drescher a écrit : > > On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> hi, > >> is it possible (and does have sense) to run concurrent jobs on a tape ? > >> no risks of corruption of datas ? > >> thanks for your tips > >> > >

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread Stéphane Lardier
John Drescher a écrit : > On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> hi, >> is it possible (and does have sense) to run concurrent jobs on a tape ? >> no risks of corruption of datas ? >> thanks for your tips >> > > No this works very well. good news. I can concurrently save my thr

Re: [Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread John Drescher
On 3/2/07, Stéphane Lardier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi, > is it possible (and does have sense) to run concurrent jobs on a tape ? > no risks of corruption of datas ? > thanks for your tips > No this works very well. John --

[Bacula-users] concurent jobs on a tape

2007-03-02 Thread Stéphane Lardier
hi, is it possible (and does have sense) to run concurrent jobs on a tape ? no risks of corruption of datas ? thanks for your tips - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and