On 1/19/11 8:31 PM, Mike Ruskai wrote:
> On 1/19/2011 7:47 PM, Juergen Zahrer wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> amanda passes the whole archive to the client even if only a few files
>> are restored. that takes a very very long time for
>> one small file in a big dump over 100 Mb.
>> what about bacula? doe
On 01/19/11 20:24, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 1/19/2011 7:47 PM, Juergen Zahrer wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> amanda passes the whole archive to the client even if only a few files
>> are restored. that takes a very very long time for
>> one small file in a big dump over 100 Mb.
>> what about bacula? does
On 1/19/2011 7:47 PM, Juergen Zahrer wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> amanda passes the whole archive to the client even if only a few files
> are restored. that takes a very very long time for
> one small file in a big dump over 100 Mb.
> what about bacula? does bacula "unpack and extract" the requested fil
On 1/19/2011 7:47 PM, Juergen Zahrer wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> amanda passes the whole archive to the client even if only a few files
> are restored. that takes a very very long time for
> one small file in a big dump over 100 Mb.
> what about bacula? does bacula "unpack and extract" the requested file
Hi list,
amanda passes the whole archive to the client even if only a few files are
restored. that takes a very very long time for
one small file in a big dump over 100 Mb.
what about bacula? does bacula "unpack and extract" the requested file on
a local _fast_ disk and transfer that file over
