Re: [Bacula-users] change tape status while backups are running

2010-06-02 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Phil Stracchino, In message <4c06c4c7.3030...@metrocast.net> you wrote: > On 06/02/10 16:28, Jesse Angell wrote: > > Is there some way I can force it to move onto the next tape mid-backup? > > Why would you want to do that? Frankly, I'm having trouble imagining a > scenario in which you'd

Re: [Bacula-users] change tape status while backups are running

2010-06-02 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 06/02/10 16:28, Jesse Angell wrote: > Is there some way I can force it to move onto the next tape mid-backup? Why would you want to do that? Frankly, I'm having trouble imagining a scenario in which you'd need to do this that cannot be handled better by fixing the Pool settings. -- Phil

Re: [Bacula-users] change tape status while backups are running

2010-06-02 Thread Jesse Angell
Is there some way I can force it to move onto the next tape mid-backup? - Original Message - From: "John Drescher" To: "Jesse Angell" , "bacula-users" Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2010 3:05:37 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] change

Re: [Bacula-users] change tape status while backups are running

2010-06-02 Thread John Drescher
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:01 PM, Jesse Angell wrote: > If I have multiple backups running to the same virtual disk based tape and > then set that tape status to full will it simply move on to the next tape > without damaging the backups in progress or existing data? > My guess is it will ignore

[Bacula-users] change tape status while backups are running

2010-06-02 Thread Jesse Angell
If I have multiple backups running to the same virtual disk based tape and then set that tape status to full will it simply move on to the next tape without damaging the backups in progress or existing data? Jesse -- Th