Re: [Bacula-users] can't run concurrent restores using multiple tape drives

2014-10-17 Thread Kern Sibbald
There is nothing I know in Bacula that specifically restricts concurrent read jobs on a storage device. If you use defaults, read/write are treated the same and are limited to maximum values configured. It is possibly, however, to restrict the number of simultaneous read jobs (at least in vers

[Bacula-users] can't run concurrent restores using multiple tape drives

2014-10-15 Thread jaredk51
@Darold lucas wrote: "Unless you Autochanger has two physical Drives for Tapes you will only be able to access one tape at a time. " Yes, there are multiple tape drives. As stated in my original post. And running regular backup jobs to this setup works great. Multiple jobs running concurren

Re: [Bacula-users] can't run concurrent restores using multiple tape drives

2014-10-14 Thread Darold Lucus
Unless you Autochanger has two physical Drives for Tapes you will only be able to access one tape at a time. Sincerely, Darold Lucus = LAN Administrator EMAC, Inc 618-529-4525 EXT:370 www.emacinc.com = On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 2:27 PM, jaredk51 wrote:

[Bacula-users] can't run concurrent restores using multiple tape drives

2014-10-13 Thread jaredk51
I'm working with Amazon VTL (Virtual Tape Library) and Bacula v 5.2.6 which functions well and can run concurrent jobs to multiple tape drives just fine. I want to speed up restores for DR purposes and make use of the 10 virtual tape drives VTL gives you. I am not sure if bacula supports restoring

[Bacula-users] can't run concurrent restores using multiple tape drives

2014-10-13 Thread jaredk51
I'm working with Amazon VTl (virtual Tape Library) and Bacula v 5.2.6 which functions well and can run concurrent jobs to multiple tape drives just fine. I want to speed up restores for DR purposes and make use of the 10 virtual tape drives VTL gives you. I am not sure if bacula supports restori