> <mailto:bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>"
> <mailto:bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] build RPM for FD 5.2 in CentOS 6
>
> My problem seems to be with TCP wrappers, but I don't understand why :
>
> Like th
ourceforge.net>"
mailto:bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] build RPM for FD 5.2 in CentOS 6
My problem seems to be with TCP wrappers, but I don't understand why :
Like this, it doesn't work :
hosts.deny :
ALL: ALL
hosts.allow :
9102: ALL
bacula-fd: ALL
My problem seems to be with TCP wrappers, but I don't understand why :
Like this, it doesn't work :
hosts.deny :
ALL: ALL
hosts.allow :
9102: ALL
bacula-fd: ALL
But if I comment the hosts.deny file (or put ALL: ALL in the hosts.allow
file), it works.
I don't see where I made a mistake ?
My
Hi
Thank you for the repositories, it works on a test machine (fresh CentOS
6.2), but not in the production one : in this last, the DIR can't
contact the FD ( iptables and TCP wrappers seem to be OK)
Maybe I missed something elsewhere.
I'll give a look
Regards
Norbert
Le 13/04/2016 12:47, Si
Hi Norbert,
I'm the Bacula mantainer for Fedora. can you use the rebuild I do of
current packages for RHEL/CentOS and Fedora? You can upgrade directly from
CentOS/RHEL packages straight to them.
They have all features enabled. Please read the included README file in
bacula-common.
Bacula 5.2: htt
Hi
I have to build a rpm for the bacula-fd 5.2 in Cent OS 6, and follow
this page :
http://www.bacula.org/5.2.x-manuals/en/utility/utility/Bacula_RPM_Packaging_FAQ.html
I downloaded and extracted the bacula-5.2.13.tar.gz file, then :
Looked at the bacula.spec.in file in "platforms/rpms/redhat/ba
