Re: [Bacula-users] bug 969 not fixed

2007-10-22 Thread Eric Bollengier
>> bug 969 shows as fixed in 2.2.5 but it is still broken for me as shown >> below. > Hi, > It seems that the 2.2.4-restore.patch doesn't have been applied to > the 2.2.5 release. Read 2.2.4-replace.patch instead of 2.2.4-restore.patch. > You can apply it yourself and rebuild the bacula-dir b

Re: [Bacula-users] bug 969 not fixed

2007-10-21 Thread Eric Bollengier
> bug 969 shows as fixed in 2.2.5 but it is still broken for me as shown > below. Hi, It seems that the 2.2.4-restore.patch doesn't have been applied to the 2.2.5 release. You can apply it yourself and rebuild the bacula-dir binary or wait for the 2.2.6 release. Sorry for this inconvenience.

[Bacula-users] bug 969 not fixed

2007-10-18 Thread Mark Nienberg
bug 969 shows as fixed in 2.2.5 but it is still broken for me as shown below. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -q bacula-mysql bacula-mysql-2.2.5-1 Run Restore job JobName: RestoreFiles Bootstrap: /var/bacula/buckeye-dir.restore.2.bsr Where: / Replace: always FileSet: