Re: [Bacula-users] btape (fill) command question

2007-02-16 Thread Alan Brown
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: >> Up to 2 hours to read through the tape sounds about right for LTO2 > > True, but after btape prints: > > Reposition from 1:5084 to 307:14499 > > it should be doing fsf 306 if configured correctly. Hopefully fast winding > the tape doesn't take 2 hours

Re: [Bacula-users] btape (fill) command question

2007-02-15 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 12:12:27 + (GMT), Alan Brown said: > > On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: > > > 2 hours sounds excessively long for an LTO drive. > > Up to 2 hours to read through the tape sounds about right for LTO2 True, but after btape prints: Reposition from 1:5084 to

Re: [Bacula-users] btape (fill) command question

2007-02-15 Thread Alan Brown
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Martin Simmons wrote: > 2 hours sounds excessively long for an LTO drive. Up to 2 hours to read through the tape sounds about right for LTO2 However, any more than that is excessive. - Take Surveys. Ea

Re: [Bacula-users] btape (fill) command question

2007-02-14 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:32:06 -0600, Jason King said: > > I am running the "FILL" command using the btape testing tool. The tape > has been filled and it wrote something (i guess) to the second tape > after asking me to mount another tape. AFter it wrote the second tape it > asked me to mo

[Bacula-users] btape (fill) command question

2007-02-13 Thread Jason King
I am running the "FILL" command using the btape testing tool. The tape has been filled and it wrote something (i guess) to the second tape after asking me to mount another tape. AFter it wrote the second tape it asked me to mount the first tape for reading. I've been at this prompt for about 2