[Bacula-users] blocked device

2008-02-04 Thread Papp Tamás
Dear all, My jobs are not running, because device is blocked: Device status: Device "DAT-72" (/dev/sa0) is not open. Device is BLOCKED. User unmounted. In Use Volume status: 20070724 on device "DAT-72" (/dev/sa0) Reader=0 writers=0 reserved=0 After mount: Device status: Device "D

Re: [Bacula-users] BLOCKED device

2006-04-06 Thread Sebastian Stark
On 04.04.2006, at 12:10, Alan Brown wrote: On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Again: how can I tell the SD to unblock a device during runtime? What seems to work for me is to manually load a tape using MTX and then trying "mount" again. For me doing this sometimes leads to a v

Re: [Bacula-users] BLOCKED device

2006-04-04 Thread Alan Brown
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Again: how can I tell the SD to unblock a device during runtime? What seems to work for me is to manually load a tape using MTX and then trying "mount" again. AB --- This SF.Net email is spon

[Bacula-users] BLOCKED device

2006-04-04 Thread Robert . Wirth
Hi, what happend: there was a missing full backup so that an incremental job was upgraded. But there was no volume present for the full backup, thus the tape device is now blocked, waiting for the mount. I decided to cancel the waiting job, because I didn't want to do the full backup now (d