Kevin Keane wrote:
> In all honesty, I'm not yet following
I've corrected the links I was referring to:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg15651.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg15776.html
A lot of this also boils down to writin
Am 31.03.2009 um 18:03 schrieb Massimo Schenone:
> Ok, do you mean that source address can be different from the
> address of
> the interface used for the connection?
Yes, this is quite common with routers. In my case it's a ipsec client
with several interfaces.
Only one interface belongs to
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 12:02 -0700, Kevin Keane wrote:
> Steve Polyack wrote:
> > Kevin Keane wrote:
> >> Inquiring minds want to know: why would you want to control the
> >> source address? Doesn't the routing table automatically select the
> >> correct one based on the destination address you wa
Steve Polyack wrote:
> Kevin Keane wrote:
>> Inquiring minds want to know: why would you want to control the
>> source address? Doesn't the routing table automatically select the
>> correct one based on the destination address you want to reach?
>>
>>
> The OS is supposed to choose a "function
Ok, do you mean that source address can be different from the address of
the interface used for the connection? or do you want to use different
source address?
Thanks :)
On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 16:57 +0200, Axel Rau wrote:
> It's the source address when the FD connect to the SD.
-
Kevin Keane wrote:
> Inquiring minds want to know: why would you want to control the source
> address? Doesn't the routing table automatically select the correct one
> based on the destination address you want to reach?
>
>
The OS is supposed to choose a "functional" address, which when paired
Axel Rau wrote:
> Am 31.03.2009 um 09:12 schrieb Massimo Schenone:
>
>
>> What does the directive FDSourceAddress stand for?
>>
> It's the source address when the FD connect to the SD.
>
>> do you mean src ip in
>> packet? what's the difference between FDSourceAddress and FDAddress?
>>
Am 31.03.2009 um 09:12 schrieb Massimo Schenone:
> What does the directive FDSourceAddress stand for?
It's the source address when the FD connect to the SD.
> do you mean src ip in
> packet? what's the difference between FDSourceAddress and FDAddress?
FDAddress is the destination address when the
What does the directive FDSourceAddress stand for? do you mean src ip in
packet? what's the difference between FDSourceAddress and FDAddress?
I supposed binding fd to an ip/port to be the solution for multihomed
clients or cluster environments..
Thanks,
m
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 23:54 +0200, Axel Ra
Am 30.03.2009 um 21:59 schrieb Steve Polyack:
> I've submitted a patch to include an option (FDSourceAddress) in
> Bacula for this. It won't be present in the Bacula source until
> after the 3.0 release.
Ah, thanks!
Axel
--- ar3
-
You can use FDAddress or FDAddresses directive in the File Daemon config file
to bind the service to only one interface.
I hope it helps..
Massimo
- Original Message -
From: Axel Rau
Date: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:57 pm
Subject: [Bacula-users] binding of outgoing connection to specific
Axel Rau wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is it posiible, to configure a file-daemon to use a specific ip-
> address to talk to the storage daemon?
> This one is running on a multi-homed host.
>
>
I've submitted a patch to include an option (FDSourceAddress) in Bacula
for this. It won't be present in the
Hi all,
is it posiible, to configure a file-daemon to use a specific ip-
address to talk to the storage daemon?
This one is running on a multi-homed host.
Thanks, Axel
--- ar3
--
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
