Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula restore problem with tape to disk followed by wanting to restore from that disk to files

2007-10-05 Thread Olaf Zevenboom
Hi list, Implemented a workaround succesfully. Just in time. 10 minutes spare! Thanks for your time. Hope to give more feedback on monday. gr, Olaf Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reali

[Bacula-users] Bacula restore problem with tape to disk followed by wanting to restore from that disk to files

2007-10-05 Thread Olaf Zevenboom
Hi list, I have the following issue: SYSTEM Running Debian Etch on a server called "backupmaster" with Bacula 2.0. I have several Windows servers running Bacula-fd too. The backupmaster has a schedule for all servers to backup their data with jobs to a local disk on the backupmaster server. I use

[Bacula-users] bacula restore problem

2005-06-13 Thread Soumik Ukil
I am having a problem with restoring files from a multiple tape backup. The restore works with a single tape backup. Only if the job spans over multiple tapes, do i get this kind of an error: 21-May 20:50 max-fd: RestoreFiles.2005-05-21_14.49.48 Error: attribs.c:339 File size of restored file /r

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula restore problem

2005-05-24 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 24 May 2005 06:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi kern, > > When i do the fill test, this is what i get back. This is for the single > tape mode. The 'test' command works fine. > > Unusual System Events > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > May 23 22:00:49 gto kernel: st0: Error with sense data: Info

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula restore problem

2005-05-23 Thread Soumik Ukil
Here are some of the details: I am running the director on Debian Linux. The director version is 1.36.1 (26 November 2004). The client is running SuSe Linux 9.2. The backup media i am using is Exabyte Mammoth-2 tape storage using Exabyte 8mm data cartridges. The restore was initialized from bco

[Bacula-users] bacula restore problem

2005-05-22 Thread Soumik Ukil
I have been trying test restores of a disk spanning Full Incremental and differential backups, and both times it runs ok, almost. Both times, out of the thousands of files , only one file gets restored incorrectly - that is the size it restores is lesser than the original backup.This is the exac