Martin Simmons wrote:
> Looks strange, unless the LastWritten dates are wrong. Which version of
> Bacula is this?
>
> Also, just to be clear, on 2006-10-14 you were expecting it to use A006,
> A007, B001 and B002 but it actually used B001 and A007 and
> then tried to use
Martin Simmons wrote:
>
> Looks strange, unless the LastWritten dates are wrong. Which version of
> Bacula is this?
>
> Also, just to be clear, on 2006-10-14 you were expecting it to use A006,
> A007, B001 and B002 but it actually used B001 and A007 and
> then tried to u
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:44:18 -0700, Maria McKinley said:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I know this subject has come up before, but I couldn't find a satisfying
> answer (could be because I got frustrated with both the gmane and
> sourceforge interfaces). I have 16 tapes that I am using for a weekly
On Sunday 15 October 2006 21:15, Julien Cigar wrote:
> I had exactly the same problem two weeks ago and I still haven't found
> an explanation why Bacula do this ...
>
> Perhaps there is a bug in Bacula recycling process when you only specify
> a Volume Retention (lower than a Job / File Retent
I had exactly the same problem two weeks ago and I still haven't found
an explanation why Bacula do this ...
Perhaps there is a bug in Bacula recycling process when you only specify
a Volume Retention (lower than a Job / File Retention) ? But in the doc
said : "The *Volume Retention* is applie
Hi there,
I know this subject has come up before, but I couldn't find a satisfying
answer (could be because I got frustrated with both the gmane and
sourceforge interfaces). I have 16 tapes that I am using for a weekly
backup that takes 4 tapes. I can't get it to cycle through the tapes in
a s
