Re: [Bacula-users] bacula configure script

2006-01-14 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 12 January 2006 21:49, Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:17:07 +0100, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > said: > > Kern> On Thursday 12 January 2006 18:37, Dimitri Puzin wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> when configuring bacula sources like > >> $ ./config

[Bacula-users] bacula configure script

2006-01-13 Thread Dimitri Puzin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, when configuring bacula sources like $ ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bacula/binaries ... then I'd expect the man directory to be set to ${prefix}/man, however it defaults to /usr/share/man. Is that wanted behavior? Regards, - -Dimitri -B

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula configure script

2006-01-12 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:17:07 +0100, Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Kern> On Thursday 12 January 2006 18:37, Dimitri Puzin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> when configuring bacula sources like >> $ ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bacula/binaries ... >> then I'd expect the man direct

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula configure script

2006-01-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 12 January 2006 18:37, Dimitri Puzin wrote: > Hi all, > > when configuring bacula sources like > $ ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bacula/binaries ... > then I'd expect the man directory to be set to ${prefix}/man, however it > defaults to /usr/share/man. Is that wanted behavior? Yes, th

[Bacula-users] bacula configure script

2006-01-12 Thread Dimitri Puzin
Hi all, when configuring bacula sources like $ ./configure --prefix=/path/to/bacula/binaries ... then I'd expect the man directory to be set to ${prefix}/man, however it defaults to /usr/share/man. Is that wanted behavior? Regards, -Dimitri -