Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] wrote: > This is what I have done so far: > > Added the Minimum Block Size = 262144/Maximum Block Size = 262144 in the > Bacula-sd.conf > > Erased the tape in the tape drive which was in the Append status and > re-lab

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]
and has not changed to the new value? Uthra -Original Message- From: Alan Brown [mailto:a...@mssl.ucl.ac.uk] Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2012 1:34 PM To: John Drescher Cc: Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]; bacula-users Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size On 31/0

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread Alan Brown
On 31/01/12 17:54, John Drescher wrote: > I believe changing the fixed block size requires this. Also remember > that after this change you will not be able to read any tapes that had > the default block size. This is why I still use the default at work. Double check this. I increased block size

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] wrote: > John, > > My backup server is still in the testing phase so I can erase the tape or > relabel them and then run the tapeinfo command to see if the block size has > changed. If I decide to go back to the defau

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] wrote: > John, > > Did you erase the tape after the change? > No, I have not erased the tape after I updated the /Bacula-sd.conf with the. > > Minimum Block Size = 262144 > Maximum Block Size = 262144 > > So, should I

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread John Drescher
2012/1/31 Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC] : > I have Bacula 5.2.3 compiled on a RHEL 6 Server. I have IBM TS3200 Tape > Library with two tape drives: LTO5 FH. I looking to see how I can get the > best performance and speed up my backups > > > > I checked with IBM and was told that my

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Tue, 31 Jan 2012 09:41:27 -0600 "Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]" wrote: > I have Bacula 5.2.3 compiled on a RHEL 6 Server. I have IBM TS3200 > Tape Library with two tape drives: LTO5 FH. I looking to see how I > can get the best performance and speed up my backups [...] > I adde

[Bacula-users] bacula block size

2012-01-31 Thread Rao, Uthra R. (GSFC-672.0)[ADNET SYSTEMS INC]
I have Bacula 5.2.3 compiled on a RHEL 6 Server. I have IBM TS3200 Tape Library with two tape drives: LTO5 FH. I looking to see how I can get the best performance and speed up my backups I checked with IBM and was told that my tape drives support a maximum block size of 256k. My understanding