* Dennis Petschull schrieb am 04.03.10 um 08:04 Uhr:
> Hey Marc,
Hi Dennis,
>
> Yes, using curlftpfs 0.9.1 would be an option, but when I tried it, I ran
> into
> this bug, http://bugs.gentoo.org/223239, which prohibits me to upload large
> files to the FTP storage.
> So this makes this vers
Hey Marc,
Yes, using curlftpfs 0.9.1 would be an option, but when I tried it, I ran into
this bug, http://bugs.gentoo.org/223239, which prohibits me to upload large
files to the FTP storage.
So this makes this version unusable for me, too.
Cheers,
Dennis
--
two4.IT
http://www.two4.it
--
Am Do
* Dennis Petschull schrieb am 03.03.10 um 20:54 Uhr:
> Hi,
>
> I am still very interested in this topic.
> Is anyone using Bacula with FTP as storage backend? How do you handle this
> situation?
>
> Thanks for your help!
Why not use 0.9.1 then instead? I do so and it works.
-Marc
--
+--
Hi,
I am still very interested in this topic.
Is anyone using Bacula with FTP as storage backend? How do you handle this
situation?
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
Dennis
--
two4.IT
http://www.two4.it
--
Am Samstag 13 Februar 2010 21:41:04 schrieb Dennis Petschull:
> Hi Karsten and others,
>
>
Hi Karsten and others,
I have encountered the same issue some time ago, too.
Did you ever find a solution/workaround/alternative for it?
I would be very interested!
Cheers,
Dennis
--
two4.IT
http://www.two4.it
--
On Wednesday 6 January 2010 21:31 Karsten Schulze wrote:
> I believe that bacula d
I believe that bacula does not work anymore with curlftpfs (version 0.9.2).
I have found several reports which describe a similar behavior.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curlftpfs/+bug/367091
http://sourceforge.net/projects/curlftpfs/forums/forum/542750/topic/3295831
Finally I "found"
