On 01/25/2018 05:19 PM, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
> If your bacula-dir runs fine when started directly but fails when
> started through systemd then you're most likely encountering a problem
> with Bacula's systemd integration.
FWIW 7.0.5 from Simone's RPMs works fine on Centos 7.
--
Dimitri Maziuk
If your bacula-dir runs fine when started directly but fails when
started through systemd then you're most likely encountering a problem
with Bacula's systemd integration. This is not unheard of. Systemd
itself is still very new and immature, and systemd integration of most
software packages even m
On 01/25/2018 01:19 PM, Ben Wong wrote:
> Is there any way to make sure it's
> running?
Yes: figure out why it's crashing and fix that.
You can use nagios, net-snmp, or mon if that's still available, to send
you an alert if bacula-dir is not running, and then you can go in and
fix whatever's cau
Hi all,
I'm setting up Bacula 9.0.6 on a CentOS 7.4.1708 server. The director,
storage daemon, and file daemon have all been configured with the same
hashed password. I first noticed an issue when I ran bconsole and the
system had trouble connecting to port 9101.
[root@backup3 ~]# bacula status
