-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use bacula for backup, but the observed perfomance is
> not good enough for our use case.
> The backup-server running Director, SD and FD (version 1.38.11 on
> Debian unstable) is an AMD Athlon(tm) X
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use bacula for backup, but the observed perfomance is
> not good enough for our use case.
> The backup-server running Director, SD and FD (version 1.38.11 on
> Debian unstable) is an AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1500+ with 1 GB of ram.
> It reads the files
Hi Sven,
I wouldn't nfs mount anything on my backup server. I would just backup
the NFS share on the server-side, i.e. run bacula-fd on the NFS server
and add the NFS shared dir to the NFS server's FileSet.
Btw, last night my clients got the following Rates in MB/s:
4,7,14, 21,10
These rates var
Hi,
On 3/20/2007 3:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use bacula for backup, but the observed perfomance is
> not good enough for our use case.
> The backup-server running Director, SD and FD (version 1.38.11 on
> Debian unstable) is an AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1500+ with 1 GB of
On 3/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use bacula for backup, but the observed perfomance is
> not good enough for our use case.
> The backup-server running Director, SD and FD (version 1.38.11 on
> Debian unstable) is an AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1500+ with 1 GB
Hi,
I would like to use bacula for backup, but the observed perfomance is
not good enough for our use case.
The backup-server running Director, SD and FD (version 1.38.11 on
Debian unstable) is an AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1500+ with 1 GB of ram.
It reads the files via Gbit-ethernet from an NFS-share.
Th
