On Wednesday 09 November 2005 00:12, Keith Brautigam wrote:
> My apologies! It looks like I sent this to the announce list by
> accident. Here it is in the right list...
>
> I can reproduce this on two separate bacula installs and two different
> autochangers. The easiest way is to make two volu
My apologies! It looks like I sent this to the announce list by
accident. Here it is in the right list...
I can reproduce this on two separate bacula installs and two different
autochangers. The easiest way is to make two volumes for catalog
backups, and create a backup schedule for the cat
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 18:31, Keith Brautigam wrote:
Short version - bacula is attempting to use a tape that is not loaded
into the autochanger even though a different, usable tape is loaded in
the autochanger.
According to the documentation (that I have seen), ba
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 18:31, Keith Brautigam wrote:
> Short version - bacula is attempting to use a tape that is not loaded
> into the autochanger even though a different, usable tape is loaded in
> the autochanger.
>
> According to the documentation (that I have seen), bacula should always
>
Short version - bacula is attempting to use a tape that is not loaded
into the autochanger even though a different, usable tape is loaded in
the autochanger.
According to the documentation (that I have seen), bacula should always
prefer to use tapes in the changer to avoid unnecessary operator
