Dear friends,
Which are the differences of this pool type versus backup? I want to have
"forever" the data saved in my LTO tapes (with retention period "for all
time").What should be the correct setup? Now I have put a volume retention of
365 years, but I don't know if it is totally properly.
Hi!
I want to ask, if there is any development to support archive jobs as
suggested in the Bacula Project Design Blog:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/wordpress/bacula/2009/09/26/archive/
Regards
--
Peter Allgeyer Salzburg|Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Dipl.-Inform. Univ.
Hello,
I made this request in a topic related to "copy" but I am seeing it's
a little out-subject.
When you make a long term Archiving how do you keep an old file list
of job that are archived by a copy job ?
In my case I am copying monthly essentials jobs to an lto tape, for
many years maybe as
Hello,
2011/5/31 Geert Stappers
> > > >> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > No.
> > > >> > > [ delete files after backup ]
> } } }} } And a backup tool should never ever delete files.
>
Well, you try to avoid a dangerous situation, but almost all existing
Op 20110530 om 10:41 schreef Konstantin Khomoutov:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:24:06 +0200 Jérôme Blion wrote:
> > >> > > [ delete files after backup ]
> > >> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> > >> > >
> > >> > No.
> > >> Not yet... :)
> > > IMNSHO it allready exists, it is named 'R
On Mon, 30 May 2011 11:41:38 +0200
Jérôme Blion wrote:
> >> >> > > [ delete files after backup ]
> >> >> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > No.
> >> >> Not yet... :)
> >> > IMNSHO it allready exists, it is named 'RunAfterJob'
> >> That's not true. An archive f
On Mon, 30 May 2011 12:41:14 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov
wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:24:06 +0200
> Jérôme Blion wrote:
>
>> >> > > [ delete files after backup ]
>> >> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
>> >> > >
>> >> > No.
>> >> Not yet... :)
>> > IMNSHO it allready exists, i
On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:24:06 +0200
Jérôme Blion wrote:
> >> > > [ delete files after backup ]
> >> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> >> > >
> >> > No.
> >> Not yet... :)
> > IMNSHO it allready exists, it is named 'RunAfterJob'
> That's not true. An archive function would only de
Il 27/05/2011 16:32, Robert Kromoser ha scritto:
> Hi folks.
>
> Does exist any archive function in bacula.
>
> What do I mean?
>
> On a Backup the backed up data from a Fileset will stay on the
> filesystem after the backup.
>
> With an archive function the backed up data from the Fileset will be
On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:05:21 +0200, Geert Stappers
wrote:
> Op 20110527 om 20:44 schreef Radosław Korzeniewski:
>> 2011/5/27 John Drescher
>> > 2011/5/27 Robert Kromoser :
>> > > [ delete files after backup ]
>> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
>> > >
>> > No.
>>
>> Not yet... :
Op 20110527 om 20:44 schreef Radosław Korzeniewski:
> 2011/5/27 John Drescher
> > 2011/5/27 Robert Kromoser :
> > > [ delete files after backup ]
> > > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> > >
> > No.
>
> Not yet... :)
IMNSHO it allready exists, it is named 'RunAfterJob'
Stappers
--
Hello,
2011/5/27 John Drescher
> 2011/5/27 Robert Kromoser :
> >
> > Does exist any configuration option for that?
> >
> No.
>
>
Not yet... :)
best regards
--
Radosław Korzeniewski
rados...@korzeniewski.net
--
vRanger
2011/5/27 Robert Kromoser :
> Hi folks.
>
>
>
> Does exist any archive function in bacula.
>
> What do I mean?
>
>
>
> On a Backup the backed up data from a Fileset will stay on the filesystem
> after the backup.
>
> With an archive function the backed up data from the Fileset will be removed
> fro
Hi folks.
Does exist any archive function in bacula.
What do I mean?
On a Backup the backed up data from a Fileset will stay on the
filesystem after the backup.
With an archive function the backed up data from the Fileset will be
removed from the filesystem.
Does exist any configurati
> 13-May 15:37 CBCK0001-dir JobId 4: Start Backup JobId 4,
> Job=CCRM0004_01_Backup_Full.2011-05-13_15.37.39_03
> 13-May 15:37 CBCK0001-dir JobId 4: Using Device "SugarCRM_CCRM0004_Full"
> 13-May 14:31 CCRM0004-fd JobId 4: Warning: bsock.c:128 Could not connect
> to Storage daemon on CBCK0001:9103.
2011/5/13 Robert Kromoser :
> Hi Everybody.
>
>
>
> I installed a new bacula 5.0.3 server on CentOS 5.5.
>
> In my configuration I use only disk backups.
>
> When I start a backup with bconsole run command, the volumes will be created
> in the catalog
>
> but won’t be created on the filesystem and
> Does the bacula user have write access to your storage location on
> your filesystem? That is assuming bacula-sd is running as user bacula
> like it does on many linux operating systems.
>
Also what do the messages say in the bacula console?
The output of
status dir
status st
and status clie
Hi Everybody.
I installed a new bacula 5.0.3 server on CentOS 5.5.
In my configuration I use only disk backups.
When I start a backup with bconsole run command, the volumes will be
created in the catalog
but won't be created on the filesystem and the jobs are remaining with
status R.
Does a
> Thomas Wakefield wrote:
>>
> Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
> 5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
> needed, we could pull the copy back from tape. We could possibly
> write 2 copies to tape for redundancy.
> ..
Thomas Wakefield wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 12, 2010, at 9:43 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>
>>> Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
needed, we could pull the copy b
Thanks for all the answers. Basically it sounds like bacula doesn't have
anything for native archive support which is what i expected. So i will do
something along the lines of what everyone else does.
On Jan 12, 2010, at 9:43 AM, John Drescher wrote:
>> Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
>>> Take a
> Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
>> Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
>> 5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
>> needed, we could pull the copy back from tape. We could possibly
>> write 2 copies to tape for redundancy.
>>
>> I already u
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Stuart McGraw wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 12:46 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
>> Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
>>> Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
>>> 5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
>>> needed, we could pull
On 01/12/2010 12:46 AM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
>> Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
>> 5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
>> needed, we could pull the copy back from tape. We could possibly
>> write 2 copies
Thomas Wakefield schrieb:
> Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly
> 5-10 years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if
> needed, we could pull the copy back from tape. We could possibly
> write 2 copies to tape for redundancy.
>
> I already use bacu
Take a directory, dump it to tape, and it will live forever (roughly 5-10
years) on tape. And the copy on disk will be deleted. But if needed, we could
pull the copy back from tape. We could possibly write 2 copies to tape for
redundancy.
I already use bacula to protect over 100TB of spinnin
Thomas Wakefield wrote:
> Is there any support in Bacula for doing archiving? I have some data i want
> to offload to tape, and i am wondering if bacula can help.
What do you consider archiving to be? As opposed to backup?
In short, what are your expectations?
Is there any support in Bacula for doing archiving? I have some data i want to
offload to tape, and i am wondering if bacula can help.
Thanks,
Thomas
Systems Administrator COLA/IGES
--
This SF.Net email is sponsored b
Jesper Krogh wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>>
>>
No need to delete the volumes from the catalog... just set their
status to something unusable... or, preferrably, disable them.
>>> Am I sure that bacula wont use a disabled "Full-run" as basis for a
>>> subsequent Incr
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>
>
>>> No need to delete the volumes from the catalog... just set their
>>> status to something unusable... or, preferrably, disable them.
>>
>> Am I sure that bacula wont use a disabled "Full-run" as basis for a
>> subsequent Incremental run?
>
> It wil
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> > No need to delete the volumes from the catalog... just set their
> > status to something unusable... or, preferrably, disable them.
>
> Am I sure that bacula wont use a disabled "Full-run" as basis for a
> subsequent Incremental run?
It will, but just
Arno Lehmann wrote:
> 14.02.2008 10:53, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>> We'd like to send some tapes every now and then to an external archive.
>> And make sure that doing a subsequent restore, bacula would think these
>> tapes are "gone", since the amount of work getting them back is generally
>> only for
Hi,
14.02.2008 10:53, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We'd like to send some tapes every now and then to an external archive.
> And make sure that doing a subsequent restore, bacula would think these
> tapes are "gone", since the amount of work getting them back is generally
> only for emergency si
>> Is there a script somewhere that takes a "volumename" and give me a
>> "tar
>> tvf-like" output of the complete volume content?
>
> 'bls' and 'bextract' will let you work directly with volumes.
Sorry.. I should have mentionend. It was my intention just to extract it
from the DB before removing
Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We'd like to send some tapes every now and then to an external archive.
> And make sure that doing a subsequent restore, bacula would think these
> tapes are "gone", since the amount of work getting them back is generally
> only for emergency situations.
>
> So I can
Hi.
We'd like to send some tapes every now and then to an external archive.
And make sure that doing a subsequent restore, bacula would think these
tapes are "gone", since the amount of work getting them back is generally
only for emergency situations.
So I can just delete the Volumes from bacul
Hi all,
I'm probably doing something a little unusual, alongside using bacula
for the usual backups I'm also performing long term data archives into
a designated archive pool.
>From time to time I will receive a request restore a subset of the
data stored in the long term archive.
The long term
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 09:04 +0200, pieter claassen wrote:
>
> My questions:
> 1. Below is the debug info. How do I determine why the device is not
> visible to bacula? What could be going on here?
What does "status dir" show? Status storage?
Run:
$ sudo bacula-sd -f -d 2>&1 | tee /var/tmp
For some reason, my backups suddenly failed after I set up two storage
sections pointing at the same storage client (the idea was that one was
for clients to back up using the VPN and the order for clients to use
directly). I might have made some other changes as well.
My backup directory is an SM
Dear All
I have started using version 2.0.0 and all is going very well to date -
thanks to the developers.
I have hit one problem in that a Windows client's Incremental backup was
as large as its Full backup - it was not changed from Incremental to Full
due to no Full backup in the catalog. Other
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Mike wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Michael Brennen might have said:
>
>> My question is this: will Bacula job migration allow the sort of
>> split use that I am doing for the unix systems? That is, will it
>> be possible, once a full transfer is done, to always do an
>> in
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Matt Cowger wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Michael Brennen wrote:
>>
>> Said another way, I do not see that a job can mount a Bacula disk
>> archive as a client file set to then spin to tape.
>
> This could be possible using a 'RunBeforeJob' script that would
> loop
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Michael Brennen might have said:
>
> For several years I have been doing my own D2D2T scheme based on
> rsync/tar. I have a large capacity disk system in the office that
> archives systems with rsync across a T1 to the colo cabinets. That is
> where rsync really is usefu
On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Michael Brennen wrote:
>
> Said another way, I do not see that a job can mount a Bacula disk
> archive as a client file set to then spin to tape.
This could be possible using a 'RunBeforeJob' script that would
loopback mount the disk archive, run the backup with
For several years I have been doing my own D2D2T scheme based on
rsync/tar. I have a large capacity disk system in the office that
archives systems with rsync across a T1 to the colo cabinets. That is
where rsync really is useful, as its differential transfer is so
efficient. I am maintaini
"If you want to write into more than one directory (i.e. to spread the
load to different disk drives), you will need to define two Device
resources, each containing an Archive Device with a different
directory."
That works, but then you're required to make difficult decisions/changes
to your Sched
I run a backup job for around 7 GB. I control the Archive Device:
it is growing. After any minutes, it does not grow bigger any more but the
backup job does not finish.
I get a canceled message with :
FD Files Written: 0
SD Files Written: 201,615
FD Bytes Written:
Will L (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ps: yes it is not really the place for this question but this
> question
> is too avoid to post somethings that could be solved few month
> ago. Is
> it some way to do a search query to the mail archive?
>
> Tr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ps: yes it is not really the place for this question but this question
is too avoid to post somethings that could be solved few month ago. Is
it some way to do a search query to the mail archive?
Try Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Bacula-f14014.html - you can search both
Hello,
On 1/4/2006 1:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
I use bacula 1.36.2 installed with the debian/sarge packages
I have this pool:
Pool {
Name = PascalPool
Pool Type = Backup
AutoPrune = yes
# Use Volume Once = yes
Recycle = yes
Label Format = "Volume-"
Volume Retention = 10 d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> Maximun Volume Jobs = 1
--^ m
> Maximun Volumes = 10
--^ m
> Accept Any Volume = no
> }
> and when i start the director i obtain:
> Config error: Keyword "MaximunVolumeJobs" not permitted in this resource.
> Perhaps you left the tr
hi,
I use bacula 1.36.2 installed with the debian/sarge packages
I have this pool:
Pool {
Name = PascalPool
Pool Type = Backup
AutoPrune = yes
# Use Volume Once = yes
Recycle = yes
Label Format = "Volume-"
Volume Retention = 10 days
Maximun Volume Jobs = 1
Maximun Volumes = 10
A
Hi There,
I'm using bacula for a short period of time.
I would like to do long time archiving of some selected Files
(they will be manually selected and putted into a sperate folder on a hard
drive).
Using bacula's scheduler I would like to run a job once a week, which will
archive these data o
53 matches
Mail list logo
