> BTW: the machine that I have been testing on is a clone of our Domain
> Controller / Exchange Server. With the exception of the minor
glitches
> mentioned above, after the restore the system came up just fine and
> users were able to log in and get their at their email. I'm still not
> an exper
Onsdag 17 januar 2007 22:11 skrev Dwight Tovey:
> I've still got a couple of minor issues with restoring a Windows system
> while using a BartPE CD:
>
> * Specifying the target for the restore. The system currently has the
> following partitions:
>Part 1 - 100G Primary partition defined as C
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 11:34 +1100, James Harper wrote:
> > I've still got a couple of minor issues with restoring a Windows
> system
> > while using a BartPE CD:
> >
> > * Specifying the target for the restore. The system currently has the
> > following partitions:
> >Part 1 - 100G Primary
No, not kidding. I agree, it is difficult to tell most of the time in
email.
I've been using Backup Exec for years. Once Symantec bought out
Veritas, things have gone decidedly south with the product. A crying
shame. Same thing happened when they acquired Powerquest's product
line of disc
> > It should do. Even Backup Exec will not restore the exchange and SQL
> > databases (except I think the actual backup exec database itself) as
> > part of the disaster recovery restore. You have to restore the disk
> > volumes and system state and then boot up and restore the databases.
>
>
On Jan 17, 2007, at 6:37 PM, James Harper wrote:
>> The other option that came to mind would be to recover the C
>> partition, boot the machine into Windows, finish creating the
>> remaining partition(s) and restore the balance of the machine while
>> in Windows. After all, we now have a nic
> The other option that came to mind would be to recover the C
> partition, boot the machine into Windows, finish creating the
> remaining partition(s) and restore the balance of the machine while
> in Windows. After all, we now have a nice wintel version of bacula we
> can use.
If the machi
> I've still got a couple of minor issues with restoring a Windows
system
> while using a BartPE CD:
>
> * Specifying the target for the restore. The system currently has the
> following partitions:
>Part 1 - 100G Primary partition defined as C:
>Part 2 - 400G Extended partition
>Pa
On Jan 17, 2007, at 3:11 PM, Dwight Tovey wrote:
> I've still got a couple of minor issues with restoring a Windows
> system
> while using a BartPE CD:
>
> * Specifying the target for the restore. The system currently has the
> following partitions:
>Part 1 - 100G Primary partition defin
I've still got a couple of minor issues with restoring a Windows system
while using a BartPE CD:
* Specifying the target for the restore. The system currently has the
following partitions:
Part 1 - 100G Primary partition defined as C:
Part 2 - 400G Extended partition
Part 3 - 400G Logi
On Friday 15 September 2006 23:20, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > Large volumes on *disk* slow down the restore if you're trying to get
> > one file back. GREATLY. Try it. I suggest smaller volumes. e.g.
> > 2GB.
>
> Yup, not only have I tried it, b
On 15 Sep 2006 at 16:20, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > Large volumes on *disk* slow down the restore if you're trying to get
> > one file back. GREATLY. Try it. I suggest smaller volumes. e.g.
> > 2GB.
>
> Yup, not only have I tried it, but it
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006, Dan Langille wrote:
> Large volumes on *disk* slow down the restore if you're trying to get
> one file back. GREATLY. Try it. I suggest smaller volumes. e.g.
> 2GB.
Yup, not only have I tried it, but it was question 1) in my original post.
It doesn't make any sense, real
On 15 Sep 2006 at 22:22, Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 9/15/2006 9:38 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I am running bacula-dir version 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) on FreeBSD
> > 6.1-RELEASE. I am fairly new to Bacula, and have just configured two Unix
> > machines and one Windows XP
Hi,
On 9/15/2006 9:38 PM, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I am running bacula-dir version 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) on FreeBSD
> 6.1-RELEASE. I am fairly new to Bacula, and have just configured two Unix
> machines and one Windows XP machine with bacula-fd. Backups have been
> running consiste
Howdy,
I am running bacula-dir version 1.38.11 (28 June 2006) on FreeBSD
6.1-RELEASE. I am fairly new to Bacula, and have just configured two Unix
machines and one Windows XP machine with bacula-fd. Backups have been
running consistently for several weeks now without issue to a USB2.0
attached
16 matches
Mail list logo
