Re: [Bacula-users] Wierd append to tape selection by Bacula

2015-09-01 Thread Radosław Korzeniewski
Hello, I personally recommend to use a Scratch Pool for tapes. When you label a new tapes add them to the Scratch, then when Bacula will require a new tape then takes it from Scratch. best regards 2015-08-31 1:26 GMT+02:00 Kern Sibbald : > Most likely you left one of the newly labelled tapes in

Re: [Bacula-users] Wierd append to tape selection by Bacula

2015-08-30 Thread Kern Sibbald
Most likely you left one of the newly labelled tapes in the drive. If Bacula finds an appendable tape in a drive, it will use that tape in preference to unmounted tapes. On 08/30/2015 07:17 AM, philhu wrote: > I added 5 tapes to my 24 slot library. I noticed bacula did not start using > the pre

[Bacula-users] Wierd append to tape selection by Bacula

2015-08-30 Thread philhu
That was it Thank you. I did move some tapes around to add the new ones. Forgot that command..Here is the output: *update slots The defined Storage resources are: 1: File1 2: File2 3: LTO-4 Select Storage resource (1-3): 3 Connecting to Storage daemon LTO-4 at bkpcentos7:910

Re: [Bacula-users] Wierd append to tape selection by Bacula

2015-08-30 Thread Heitor Faria
> I added 5 tapes to my 24 slot library. I noticed bacula did not start using > the > previous tape in append mode that it had been using. It skipped to the next. > > Then after I labelled the new tapes (label barcodes slots=17-22), the next job > then skipped a blank tape and went to another

[Bacula-users] Wierd append to tape selection by Bacula

2015-08-30 Thread philhu
I added 5 tapes to my 24 slot library. I noticed bacula did not start using the previous tape in append mode that it had been using. It skipped to the next. Then after I labelled the new tapes (label barcodes slots=17-22), the next job then skipped a blank tape and went to another new tape.