On 12.08.2015 15:17, Andrey Tataranovich wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:47:40 +0100
> Martin Simmons wrote:
>
>> You could use bls -j with the volume file to scan the whole volume.
> I'm upset with bls behavior - it does not return non zero exit code
> on error and output error messages to stdout
Sorry, my earlier message was incomplete :)
Hello all,
Looking at the 7.0.5 version code, It seems that the part that checks the
checksum error (block_util.c, unser_block_header function) detects the
checksum error but does not return the non zero exit code, as occurs in
other parts of the code,
Hello all,
Looking at the 7.0.5 version code, It seems that the part that checks the
checksum error (block_util.c) detects the checksum error but does not
return the non zero exit code, as occurs in other parts of the code.
block->read_errors++;
if (!forge_on) {
retu
On Wednesday 2015-08-12 16:17:42 Andrey Tataranovich wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:47:40 +0100
>
> Martin Simmons wrote:
> > You could use bls -j with the volume file to scan the whole volume.
>
> I'm upset with bls behavior - it does not return non zero exit code
> on error and output error m
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:37:13 -0300 (BRT)
Heitor Faria wrote:
> Hello Andrey: I think it was the developer option not to terminate de
> bls on error if this kind of message / alert happens, after all it's
> not pretty much it's purpose. I think you can change both things with
> a little shell scri
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:47:40 +0100
> Martin Simmons wrote:
>
>> You could use bls -j with the volume file to scan the whole volume.
>
> I'm upset with bls behavior - it does not return non zero exit code
> on error and output error messages to stdout instead of stderr.
>
> # bls -j /bacula/ba
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:47:40 +0100
Martin Simmons wrote:
> You could use bls -j with the volume file to scan the whole volume.
I'm upset with bls behavior - it does not return non zero exit code
on error and output error messages to stdout instead of stderr.
# bls -j /bacula/backup/Libvirt-0177
On 8/11/2015 2:04 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 08/11/15 13:52, Andrey Tataranovich wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:47:40 +0100
>> Martin Simmons wrote:
>>
>>> You could use bls -j with the volume file to scan the whole volume.
>>>
>>> I recomend use a more secure fileserver to store your bac
On 08/11/15 13:52, Andrey Tataranovich wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:47:40 +0100
> Martin Simmons wrote:
>
>> You could use bls -j with the volume file to scan the whole volume.
>>
>> I recomend use a more secure fileserver to store your backups (RAID,
>> or ZFS).
>
> This error has happened o
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:47:40 +0100
Martin Simmons wrote:
> You could use bls -j with the volume file to scan the whole volume.
>
> I recomend use a more secure fileserver to store your backups (RAID,
> or ZFS).
This error has happened on mirror raid, so maybe only filesystems
like zfs/btrfs cou
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 13:43:52 +0300, Andrey Tataranovich said:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I'm using bacula 5.2.6 to backup several servers to HDD storage.
> Recently I tried to restore a backup job which is about a week old and
> encounter problem:
>
> Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:40:30 -0400
Bill Arlofski wrote:
> As of v5.2.x, you have the ability to specify any jobid to be
> verified on the command line. From the v5.2.1 main.pdf manual:
>
> 8<
> New Features in 5.2.x
> 3.6 Ability to Verify any specified Job
>
> You now have the ability
ncial Bacula Início 5 de agosto:
> > http://www.bacula.com.br/?p=2174
> > 61 8268-4220
> > Site: www.bacula.com.br | Facebook: heitor.faria
> >
> > - Original Message -----
> >> From: "Andrey Tataranovich"
> >>
On 08/11/2015 06:43 AM, Andrey Tataranovich wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm using bacula 5.2.6 to backup several servers to HDD storage.
> Recently I tried to restore a backup job which is about a week old and
> encounter problem:
>
> Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331430350!
> Block chec
- Original Message -
>> From: "Andrey Tataranovich"
>> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 8:46:24 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:05:14 -0400
>>
k: heitor.faria
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrey Tataranovich"
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 8:46:24 AM
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Way to check ANY bacula volume on disk
> On Tue,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 07:05:14 -0400
Josh Fisher wrote:
> Bacula volumes are just normal files. You could periodically check
> the filesystem with e2fsck or whatever tool is used for the
> filesystem you are using.
I already tried to run fsck on bacula volume when error occured, but
found no error
On 8/11/2015 6:43 AM, Andrey Tataranovich wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm using bacula 5.2.6 to backup several servers to HDD storage.
> Recently I tried to restore a backup job which is about a week old and
> encounter problem:
>
> Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331430350!
> Block checks
Hello all,
I'm using bacula 5.2.6 to backup several servers to HDD storage.
Recently I tried to restore a backup job which is about a week old and
encounter problem:
Error: block.c:318 Volume data error at 2:1331430350!
Block checksum mismatch in block=153792 len=64512: calc=782b2290
blk=5201271d
19 matches
Mail list logo
