Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage

2013-02-07 Thread Jean-Louis Dupond
Is it correct that every Volume needs to have an Unique Slot number? Its not possible to have multiple devices using a different Slot? Op 07-02-13 01:30, John Drescher schreef: >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/vchanger/ >> I've been playing a bit with the vchanger and disk-changer now. >> But

Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage

2013-02-06 Thread John Drescher
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/vchanger/ > I've been playing a bit with the vchanger and disk-changer now. > But am I right about the following: > > You can specify a number of slots, but there is a hardcoded slot limit, > so also a hardcoded Volume Limit? > > Because currenly I have "Max Jobs

Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage

2013-02-06 Thread Jean-Louis Dupond
Op 06-02-13 18:53, John Drescher schreef: >> Not the pool, your storage has two devices. For multiple devices in a >> Backup2Disk Storage you have to use a script to emulate a tape library >> with two or more devices and an autochanger. For Bacula your Backup2Disk >> storage is like a library with

Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage

2013-02-06 Thread John Drescher
> Not the pool, your storage has two devices. For multiple devices in a > Backup2Disk Storage you have to use a script to emulate a tape library > with two or more devices and an autochanger. For Bacula your Backup2Disk > storage is like a library with one tape. Agreed. For disk based storage I hi

Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage

2013-02-06 Thread Jummo
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote: > > How can a Pool be defined with 2 Storage devices? > The Pool defines: > Storage = ApolloFile > > But you can't define 2 devices for 1 storage? > > Any change to get an example? Cause the Virtual Full documentation is not > always as clear. > Not t

Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage

2013-02-06 Thread Jean-Louis Dupond
On 2013-02-06 10:46, Jummo wrote: > On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for the answer. >> But what about this then: >> If you then want to do subsequent backups, you may need to move the >> Virtual Full Volume back to your normal backup pool. Alternatively, >> you

Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage

2013-02-06 Thread Jummo
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the answer. > But what about this then: > If you then want to do subsequent backups, you may need to move the Virtual > Full Volume back to your normal backup pool. Alternatively, you can set your > Next Pool to point to the cur

Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage

2013-02-06 Thread Jean-Louis Dupond
Hi, Thanks for the answer. But what about this then: If you then want to do subsequent backups, you may need to move the Virtual Full Volume back to your normal backup pool. Alternatively, you can set your Next Pool to point to the current pool. This will cause Bacula to read and write to Volum

Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage

2013-02-06 Thread Jummo
Hi Jean-Louis, On Tue, 5 Feb 2013, Jean-Louis Dupond wrote: Hi, I've been playing with Bacula a bit lately, and it works quite fine :) But now I want to use Virtual Full backup's. This to minimize bandwith used by Bacula. I have the following Pool: Pool {   Name = ApolloFile   Pool Type = B

[Bacula-users] Virtual Full's - Waiting for Storage

2013-02-05 Thread Jean-Louis Dupond
Hi, I've been playing with Bacula a bit lately, and it works quite fine :) But now I want to use Virtual Full backup's. This to minimize bandwith used by Bacula. I have the following Pool: Pool { Name = ApolloFile Pool Type = Backup Storage = ApolloFile Maximum Volume Jobs = 2 Next Poo