;origine-
> De : Justin Case
> Envoyé : mercredi 4 décembre 2024 11:43
> À : Lionel PLASSE
> Cc : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Verify job error
>
> Lionel, I do not think that this error means that verify capability is
> missing. I thin
m confused with initcatalog and data level)
Thanks
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Case
Envoyé : mercredi 4 décembre 2024 11:43
À : Lionel PLASSE
Cc : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Verify job error
Lionel, I do not think that this error me
=> BUSTER_BKP is debian the dir and also a fd client (on
Windows client fd it's the same)
Linux Buster
-Message d'origine-
De : Justin Case
Envoyé : mardi 3 décembre 2024 14:53
À : Lionel PLASSE
Cc : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Verify job er
ient fd it's the same)
> Linux Buster
>
>
>
> -Message d'origine-----
> De : Justin Case
> Envoyé : mardi 3 décembre 2024 14:53
> À : Lionel PLASSE
> Cc : bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Objet : Re: [Bacula-users] Verify job error
>
&g
What type is the job you want to verify? Verify does only work for Backup type
jobs (not for Copy type jobs).
> On 19. Nov 2024, at 13:21, Lionel PLASSE wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've just seen that I can't do initcatalog/verify job because : Fatal
> error: fd_cmds.c:460 Unimplemented backup lev
Hello,
I've just seen that I can't do initcatalog/verify job because : Fatal
error: fd_cmds.c:460 Unimplemented backup level 86 V
And in bconsole when typing run command, the (job) choice menu doesnt'
present any 9-verify option I have 9-plugins options instead
I'm under debian linux bookwo
> On Wed, 8 May 2019 09:28:05 -0700, Mike Benoit said:
>
> Clearly the verify job either isn't verifying anything or isn't verifying
> what I expect it to be verifying.
Was the test restore directory empty before you did the restore?
> I noticed in the v7.4
On 09/05/2019 03:07, Wanderlei Huttel wrote:
Hello Mike
Try to upgrade your very old bacula client to a new one (at least as the
same version of bacula-dir)
Slight correction, clients (file daemons) can not be newer than
directors or storage daemons, so only update to the same version as you
Hello Mike
Try to upgrade your very old bacula client to a new one (at least as the
same version of bacula-dir)
Best regards
*Wanderlei Hüttel*
http://www.bacula.com.br
Em qua, 8 de mai de 2019 às 13:31, Mike Benoit
escreveu:
> We have some jobs that backup SQL databases, so immediately aft
We have some jobs that backup SQL databases, so immediately after the
backup is complete we have a "AfterJob" that restores it to a test system,
then we run a DiskToCatalog verify job. However the restore fails with a
Block checksum mismatch and immediately after the verify job succeeds.
The backu
I will reply myself :)
In documentation have lack.
Type is not define, must be Verify
Works. Thanks ;)
*—*
*Petar Kozić*
System Administrator
On March 27, 2017 at 9:45:37 AM, Petar Kozić (petar.ko...@mint.rs) wrote:
Hi folks,
I need yours help.
I see in documentation New features in 7.4.0
Hi folks,
I need yours help.
I see in documentation New features in 7.4.0. for verify job:
"2.2.1 Verify Volume Data
It is now possible to have a Verify Job configured with level=Data to
reread all records from a job and optionally check the size and the
checksum of all files.
# Verify Job def
Hello I'm running a Verify Job (Level = Data) every Monday, and this is the
second time that the problem occurs, the Job getting stopped with running
status.
I enable debug / trace in the director and in the storage, but in the trace
files doesn't grow
I used these commands below:
setdebug level=
Hey
In a particular bacula setup we have for a client we have 2 different
storage devices that backups are being rotated between. To accomodate
this I have a default Storage defined for all jobs, but this is
overwritten in the Pool definitions. (different pool per weekday) The
pool to use is s
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Ralf Gross wrote:
> Krysztofiak schrieb:
>> Hello,
>> is there a possibility to run Verify Job for a certain Backup Job (not the
>> last one) with Level=VolumeToCatalog?
>> For example I run two Backup Jobs with ids 1 and 2 and then I want to Verify
>> the first
Krysztofiak schrieb:
> Hello,
> is there a possibility to run Verify Job for a certain Backup Job (not the
> last one) with Level=VolumeToCatalog?
> For example I run two Backup Jobs with ids 1 and 2 and then I want to Verify
> the first one.
that's not possible at the moment with 5.0.x, but it'
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:46 PM, John Drescher wrote:
>> is there a possibility to run Verify Job for a certain Backup Job (not the
>> last one) with Level=VolumeToCatalog?
>> For example I run two Backup Jobs with ids 1 and 2 and then I want to Verify
>> the first one.
>>
>
> I have seen this
> is there a possibility to run Verify Job for a certain Backup Job (not the
> last one) with Level=VolumeToCatalog?
> For example I run two Backup Jobs with ids 1 and 2 and then I want to Verify
> the first one.
>
I have seen this myself and I believe this is a bug.
John
-
Hello,
is there a possibility to run Verify Job for a certain Backup Job (not the last
one) with Level=VolumeToCatalog?
For example I run two Backup Jobs with ids 1 and 2 and then I want to Verify
the first one.
+--
|This was se
>
> Do you have Incremental in the schedule definition? You probably need a
> separate schedule for the verify jobs with no Level specified.
>
Great removing the level in the schedule worked.
Thanks!
+--
|This was sent by
> On Mon, 10 May 2010 13:05:49 -0400, ikkysleepy said:
>
> I am having some problem with the verify Job. The job always fails when
> scheduled but if I run the job manually then it works fine.
> ...
> For some reason the Verify Level is being set to Incremental. Do I need to
> specify "Verif
I am having some problem with the verify Job. The job always fails when
scheduled but if I run the job manually then it works fine.
Here is my job:
Job {
Name = "Backup-Drive1-Verify"
Type = Verify
Level = Volume To Catalog
Client = "Backup-fd"
FileSet = "BackupSet"
Schedule = "Sch
Martin Simmons schrieb:
> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:56:33 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
> >
> > Martin Simmons schrieb:
> > > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:54:26 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
> > > >
> > > > Martin Simmons schrieb:
> > > > > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:51:17 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
> > > >
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:56:33 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
>
> Martin Simmons schrieb:
> > > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:54:26 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
> > >
> > > Martin Simmons schrieb:
> > > > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:51:17 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
> > > > >
> > > > > bacula 3.0.2, psql, debi
Martin Simmons schrieb:
> > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:54:26 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
> >
> > Martin Simmons schrieb:
> > > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:51:17 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
> > > >
> > > > bacula 3.0.2, psql, debian etch
> > > >
> > > > Every now and then I receive error mails about miss
> On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:54:26 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
>
> Martin Simmons schrieb:
> > > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:51:17 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
> > >
> > > bacula 3.0.2, psql, debian etch
> > >
> > > Every now and then I receive error mails about missing files from verify
> > > jobs
> > >
Martin Simmons schrieb:
> > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 09:51:17 +0100, Ralf Gross said:
> >
> > bacula 3.0.2, psql, debian etch
> >
> > Every now and then I receive error mails about missing files from verify
> > jobs
> > where I can't find the problem.
>
> Does it report all files as missing in th
Hi,
bacula 3.0.2, psql, debian etch
Every now and then I receive error mails about missing files from verify jobs
where I can't find the problem.
The backup job:
31-Okt 03:34 VUMEM004-dir JobId 16728: Bacula VUMEM004-dir 3.0.2 (18Jul09):
31-Okt-2009 03:34:20
Build OS: x86_64-p
Hi,
I read [1] and [2] about Verify Jobs and was clear for me the follow:
Verify Job serves to verify if happened something changed.
So, I create a FileSet that indicate files that aren't changed
frequently, to find out
updates or intrusions.
But to verify if my backups are ok?
The signature SH
Hi,
I read [1] and [2] about Verify Jobs and was clear for me the follow:
Verify Job serves to verify if happened something changed.
So, I create a FileSet that indicate files that aren't changed
frequently, to find out
updates or intrusions.
But to verify if my backups are ok?
The signature SH
Hi,
I read [1] and [2] about Verify Jobs and was clear for me the follow:
Verify Job serves to verify if happened something changed.
So, I create a FileSet that indicate files that aren't changed
frequently, to find out
updates or intrusions.
But to verify if my backups are ok?
The signature SH
Hi all,
I have had some bad filesystem errors detected after a fsck of a
servers /home partition and I think some files might be gone.
I have a recent backup of everything important on that partition.
Now I want to know if important files have vanished.
I do not have a Verify job created yet an
Ralf Gross schrieb:
>
> I`m having a hard time finding the reason why my verify jobs are
> failing with bacula 2.4.4.
>
> This week a backup of ~10 TB data finished without errors. The backup
> job ueses one of three LTO-4 drives in a autochanger.
>
> Now the VolumeToCatalog verify job fails eac
Hi,
I`m having a hard time finding the reason why my verify jobs are
failing with bacula 2.4.4.
This week a backup of ~10 TB data finished without errors. The backup
job ueses one of three LTO-4 drives in a autochanger.
Now the VolumeToCatalog verify job fails each time. I tried two
different dr
Arno Lehmann said:
> 18.02.2009 09:36, Ralf Gross wrote:
>> Ralf Gross said:
>>> lately I've seen that verify jobs that have differences just doesn't
>>> finish.
>>>
>>> bacula 2.4.4-b1, psql
>>>
>>> *st dir
>>>
>>> ...
>>> This is starting to be annoying because the volumes are then locked
>>> un
Hi,
18.02.2009 09:36, Ralf Gross wrote:
> Ralf Gross said:
>> lately I've seen that verify jobs that have differences just doesn't
>> finish.
>>
>> bacula 2.4.4-b1, psql
>>
>> *st dir
>>
>> ...
>> This is starting to be annoying because the volumes are then locked until
>> I cancel thee job.
>
>
Ralf Gross said:
> lately I've seen that verify jobs that have differences just doesn't
> finish.
>
> bacula 2.4.4-b1, psql
>
> *st dir
>
> [...]
>
> Running Jobs:
> JobId Level Name Status
> ==
> 9602 Vo
Hi,
lately I've seen that verify jobs that have differences just doesn't finish.
bacula 2.4.4-b1, psql
*st dir
[...]
Running Jobs:
JobId Level Name Status
==
9602 VolumeT VerifyVU0EF005-Absicherung
.. if the message-resource contains:
catalog = all
like this one i'm using:
> Messages {
> Name = VerifyJobs
> mailcommand = "/sbin/bsmtp -h localhost -f \"\(Bacula\) %r\" -s \"%t %e of
> %c %l\" %r"
> mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] = all
> catalog = all
> }
what i have done:
after an InitCat
> to me it looks like InitCatalog must run twice before all changes are known
> and the regular verify behaves the way it should.
>
> (note: I have not done any changes to the system between the two jobs and
> auto update is disabled. I am not running a virus scanner or anything else
> that could t
Hello,
I see this for quite a while now and it does not seem to disappear with
2.0.1... maybe someone has the same problem?
yesterday I was upgrading my system and ran a "InitCatalog" manually
thereafter. This morning my regular verify job failed with reporting that
some hundred files have cha
Hi!
I just tried to test a tape I suspect to be faulty. In addition I dd'ed
random data somewhere onto that tape to test drive speed.
I started a "verify" on the first job I wrote to the tape, fully
expecting it to fail. Instead I just got a message:
30-Mar 11:57 mail-sd: verify.2006-03-30_11.49.
I want to run a verify of my backup job immediately following write to
tape. The manual mentions this can be done, but I am not sure of the
correct configuration. I would like reuse as much of the Backup Job config
as possible (eg the same FileSet, Schecdule and Pool resources). Some
questions:
Hi Kern,
I'm using Bacula whith Debian Testing.
After migrating to Bacula 1.38.3 (Dec. 22 2005) I started the Verify Job manualy.
After 10 houers I gout these Error MSG:
__
26-Dec 22:01 nas01-sd: Got EOF at file 2 on device "HP-SSL1016" (/dev/nst
Hi Kern,
the Bacula runs on Debian Testing.
Mayby I should try the 1.38.3 Version.
Am Montag, den 26.12.2005, 15:00 +0100 schrieb Kern Sibbald:
Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
Viktor Dihor
Fernwärme Ulm GmbH
Tel. +49-731-3992-267
Fax. +49-731-3992-5-267 E-
On second though after looking more closely at your output, I see you are
using FreeBSD (most likely), and FreeBSD has a problem that the SCSI guy is
working on, which prevents Bacula from opening the drive if there is no tape
in the drive. As a consequence, if you load something into the dri
Please try the beta version of 1.38.3 (22 December 2005).
On Monday 26 December 2005 12:17, Dihor, Viktor wrote:
> Hi Bacula Friends,
>
> I'm using the verify Job since Bacula 1.34.
>
> After upgrading to 1.38.2 these job still fails.
>
> Here the Config Part of the Dir config:
>
>
> Job {
> Na
Hi Bacula Friends,
I'm using the verify Job since Bacula 1.34.
After upgrading to 1.38.2 these job still fails.
Here the Config Part of the Dir config:
Job {
Name = "NAS-Woche-Verify-Volume2Catalog"
Type = Verify
Level = VolumeToCatalog # default level
Verify Job = "NAS-Weekly"
48 matches
Mail list logo
