Re: [Bacula-users] Ver 2.4.4 not associating mounted tapes with any pool

2009-03-26 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 4:14 PM, terryc wrote: > John Drescher wrote: > >> You are talking about the status storage screen? > > Yes, and more >> >> If so that is harmless.  The first mount should pick up the correct >> pool. > > That is the problem as it doesn't. Requires a physical removal of the

Re: [Bacula-users] Ver 2.4.4 not associating mounted tapes with any pool

2009-03-26 Thread terryc
John Drescher wrote: > You are talking about the status storage screen? Yes, and more > > If so that is harmless. The first mount should pick up the correct > pool. That is the problem as it doesn't. Requires a physical removal of the tape from the drive. -- Terry Collins {:-)} Bicycl

Re: [Bacula-users] Ver 2.4.4 not associating mounted tapes with any pool

2009-03-26 Thread John Drescher
> Since I upgraded my Debian etch to Lenny and a resultant bacula upgrade, > a problem has emerged with bacula. It is failing to associate a existing > tape with its pool. > > Particularly applies to a tape sitting in the drive when DIR is > started/restarted. It reads the label correctly, but then

[Bacula-users] Ver 2.4.4 not associating mounted tapes with any pool

2009-03-26 Thread terryc
Since I upgraded my Debian etch to Lenny and a resultant bacula upgrade, a problem has emerged with bacula. It is failing to associate a existing tape with its pool. Particularly applies to a tape sitting in the drive when DIR is started/restarted. It reads the label correctly, but then has no