On 2017-07-05 09:27, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> Please carefully consider the advice from Josh Fisher. It is very good
> advice.
>
> Kern
Yes, agree.
> On 07/04/2017 12:46 AM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>> On 2017-07-03 17:01, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> There is no way to get two autocha
Please carefully consider the advice from Josh Fisher. It is very good
advice.
Kern
On 07/04/2017 12:46 AM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
On 2017-07-03 17:01, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
There is no way to get two autochangers to work on the same Volumes.
You can try but it is almost sure to f
On 7/3/2017 6:46 PM, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
On 2017-07-03 17:01, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
There is no way to get two autochangers to work on the same Volumes.
You can try but it is almost sure to fail, because it was not
designed that way. You can potentially use the two autochangers w
On 2017-07-03 17:01, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
There is no way to get two autochangers to work on the same Volumes. You
can try but it is almost sure to fail, because it was not designed that
way. You can potentially use the two autochangers with two separate
pools, and get Bacula to use bo
Hello,
There is no way to get two autochangers to work on the same Volumes.
You can try but it is almost sure to fail, because it was not designed
that way. You can potentially use the two autochangers with two
separate pools, and get Bacula to use both of them. This (multiple
drives with
Hello,
As stated in the subject, how can one get two (identical) changers work
together seamlessly in the same pool so when one has its tapes filled up
the next will continue without intervention?
Thanks,
//per
--
C
