Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade from 1.36.3 to the latest version

2006-03-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 01 March 2006 15:23, Michel Meyers wrote: > Arunav Mandal wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 February 2006 17:19, Arno Lehmann wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> On 2/28/2006 2:14 PM, Arunav Mandal wrote: > >>> We are running Bacula 1.36.3 in both director and storage daemon and on > >>> clients as we

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade from 1.36.3 to the latest version

2006-03-01 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arunav Mandal wrote: On Tuesday 28 February 2006 17:19, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, On 2/28/2006 2:14 PM, Arunav Mandal wrote: We are running Bacula 1.36.3 in both director and storage daemon and on clients as well. We are now planning to upgrade t

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade from 1.36.3 to the latest version

2006-03-01 Thread Arunav Mandal
On Tuesday 28 February 2006 17:19, Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hello, > > On 2/28/2006 2:14 PM, Arunav Mandal wrote: > > We are running Bacula 1.36.3 in both director and storage daemon and on > > clients as well. We are now planning to upgrade the director and storage > > daemon do I have to upgrade the

Re: [Bacula-users] Upgrade from 1.36.3 to the latest version

2006-02-28 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, On 2/28/2006 2:14 PM, Arunav Mandal wrote: We are running Bacula 1.36.3 in both director and storage daemon and on clients as well. We are now planning to upgrade the director and storage daemon do I have to upgrade the client as well or just the director and storage daemon will work?

[Bacula-users] Upgrade from 1.36.3 to the latest version

2006-02-28 Thread Arunav Mandal
We are running Bacula 1.36.3 in both director and storage daemon and on clients as well. We are now planning to upgrade the director and storage daemon do I have to upgrade the client as well or just the director and storage daemon will work? Is there any easy way to upgrade a lot of client mac