> -Original Message-
> From: Brian Debelius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 11:11 AM
> To: Robert Nelson
> Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Trying to workaround the MTWEOF error
>
> Well, I know tha
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 6:21 AM
>> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [Bacula-users] Trying to workaround the MTWEOF error
>>
>> Is there a way I can work around the end of tape MTWEOF error by telling
>> bacula to limit the amount of data written to the
---
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bacula-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Debelius
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 6:21 AM
> To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Bacula-users] Trying to workaround the MTWEOF error
>
> Is there a way I can work around
Yes, use the "maximum volume bytes" directive to limit the amount of
data stored to a tape. Once bacula sees that much data has been written,
it should label the volume as "full" and ask you for the next tape in
the pool.
Jason
Brian Debelius wrote:
> Brian Debelius wrote:
>
>> Is there a w
Brian Debelius wrote:
> Is there a way I can work around the end of tape MTWEOF error by telling
> bacula to limit the amount of data written to the tape? Lets say I have
> an 80GB tape. Is there a way to tell bacula to only write 75 or 70GB
> and then start a new tape?
>
> My next thought is,
Is there a way I can work around the end of tape MTWEOF error by telling
bacula to limit the amount of data written to the tape? Lets say I have
an 80GB tape. Is there a way to tell bacula to only write 75 or 70GB
and then start a new tape?
My next thought is, Can logic be added to bacula suc
