On Thursday 22 June 2006 19:15, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2006 at 19:07, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 June 2006 17:21, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > On 22 Jun 2006 at 17:09, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 22 June 2006 14:17, James Cort wrote:
> > > > > A few weeks ago I posted
On Thursday 22 June 2006 17:49, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:21:41 -0400, Dan Langille said:
> >
> > Priority: normal
> > Content-description: Mail message body
> >
> > On 22 Jun 2006 at 17:09, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > On Thursday 22 June 2006 14:17, James Cort wrote:
> > >
On 22 Jun 2006 at 19:07, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Thursday 22 June 2006 17:21, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 22 Jun 2006 at 17:09, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > On Thursday 22 June 2006 14:17, James Cort wrote:
> > > > A few weeks ago I posted to this list with a problem concerning my
> > > > tapes encou
On Thursday 22 June 2006 17:21, Dan Langille wrote:
> On 22 Jun 2006 at 17:09, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Thursday 22 June 2006 14:17, James Cort wrote:
> > > A few weeks ago I posted to this list with a problem concerning my
> > > tapes encountering errors around the 100G mark which resulted in ba
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:21:41 -0400, Dan Langille said:
> Priority: normal
> Content-description: Mail message body
>
> On 22 Jun 2006 at 17:09, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 22 June 2006 14:17, James Cort wrote:
> > > A few weeks ago I posted to this list with a problem concerning m
On 22 Jun 2006 at 17:09, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Thursday 22 June 2006 14:17, James Cort wrote:
> > A few weeks ago I posted to this list with a problem concerning my tapes
> > encountering errors around the 100G mark which resulted in bacula ending
> > them and moving onto another tape.
> >
> >
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 13:17:02 +0100, James Cort said:
>
> A few weeks ago I posted to this list with a problem concerning my tapes
> encountering errors around the 100G mark which resulted in bacula ending
> them and moving onto another tape.
>
> As suggested, I swapped the SCSI card for an
On Thursday 22 June 2006 14:17, James Cort wrote:
> A few weeks ago I posted to this list with a problem concerning my tapes
> encountering errors around the 100G mark which resulted in bacula ending
> them and moving onto another tape.
>
> As suggested, I swapped the SCSI card for an Adaptec unit,
A few weeks ago I posted to this list with a problem concerning my tapes
encountering errors around the 100G mark which resulted in bacula ending
them and moving onto another tape.
As suggested, I swapped the SCSI card for an Adaptec unit, however the
problem persists:
22-Jun 12:16 gemini-sd: Sen
