On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 11:46 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> No, and given the difficulties in dealing with tapes, this is probably not
> something I am going to try. First, there should not be any failed jobs.
> Second, I think this kind of problem will probably be best dealt with by
> "merging" t
On Sunday 14 August 2005 21:23, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 August 2005 04:04, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> >>Kern,
> >>This question is probably your bailiwick. In the event of a failed job
> >>in bacula, is there any existing mechanism to tell Bacula to (logically)
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Sunday 14 August 2005 04:04, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
>>Kern,
>>This question is probably your bailiwick. In the event of a failed job
>>in bacula, is there any existing mechanism to tell Bacula to (logically)
>>erase that job from the tape and treat that portion of the t
On Sunday 14 August 2005 04:04, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> Kern,
> This question is probably your bailiwick. In the event of a failed job
> in bacula, is there any existing mechanism to tell Bacula to (logically)
> erase that job from the tape and treat that portion of the tape as
> unused? Logic s
Kern,
This question is probably your bailiwick. In the event of a failed job
in bacula, is there any existing mechanism to tell Bacula to (logically)
erase that job from the tape and treat that portion of the tape as
unused? Logic says it should be basically a simple matter of resetting
VolBytes
