On Aug 31, 2011, at 12:23 PM, morgan_cox wrote:
> Thank you for your feedback everybody
>
> I have changed the config and retried - It again failed... [Crying or Very
> sad] [Crying or Very sad]
>
> However seemed to go a bit further - it failed at a slightly different point
> (this time I
Thank you for your feedback everybody
I have changed the config and retried - It again failed... [Crying or Very
sad] [Crying or Very sad]
However seemed to go a bit further - it failed at a slightly different point
(this time I believe it changed the tape!)
Here is the error:-
--
Thank you for your feedback everybody
I have changed the config and retried - It again failed... [Crying or Very
sad] [Crying or Very sad]
However seemed to go a bit further - it failed at a slightly different point
(this time I believe it changed the tape)
Here is the error:-
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 04:34:00 -0700, morgan_cox wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just got this error when trying the fill test on the 2nd tape.
>
> 'dev open failed: dev.c:491 Unable to open device "LTO-4"
> (/dev/nst0): ERR=No medium found'
Hi,
I suspect you got your indexes messed up.
I.e. You are loading d
> Just got this error when trying the fill test on the 2nd tape.
>
> 'dev open failed: dev.c:491 Unable to open device "LTO-4" (/dev/nst0): ERR=No
> medium found'
>
> Since about March this year we have had a tape drive - a Neo 200s that I have
> been (failing) trying to get working with (z)a
Hi
Just got this error when trying the fill test on the 2nd tape.
'dev open failed: dev.c:491 Unable to open device "LTO-4" (/dev/nst0): ERR=No
medium found'
Since about March this year we have had a tape drive - a Neo 200s that I have
been (failing) trying to get working with (z)amanda an