Re: [Bacula-users] Tape compression and encryption

2006-09-18 Thread Vladimir Doisan
I have similar findings with GnuPG. If I try to encrypt AND compress the bacula volume, I get almost 0 compression ratio. As somebody mentioned the only way to accomplish your task is to compress the file with FD before encryption. Michael Brennen wrote: > I enabled encryption on 1.39.23 using the

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape compression and encryption

2006-09-17 Thread Michael Brennen
Frank Sweetser wrote: > On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 07:36:46PM -0500, Michael Brennen wrote: > >> I enabled encryption on 1.39.23 using the FD keys on Friday. >> During a full backup over the weekend I noticed that the 35/70 DLT >> tapes seemed to hold less than I have seen before, about 35G in on

Re: [Bacula-users] Tape compression and encryption

2006-09-17 Thread Frank Sweetser
On Sun, Sep 17, 2006 at 07:36:46PM -0500, Michael Brennen wrote: > > I enabled encryption on 1.39.23 using the FD keys on Friday. > During a full backup over the weekend I noticed that the 35/70 DLT > tapes seemed to hold less than I have seen before, about 35G in one > case and somewhat over 3

[Bacula-users] Tape compression and encryption

2006-09-17 Thread Michael Brennen
I enabled encryption on 1.39.23 using the FD keys on Friday. During a full backup over the weekend I noticed that the 35/70 DLT tapes seemed to hold less than I have seen before, about 35G in one case and somewhat over 30G in another. I am wondering if the encrypted data might conflict with au