Re: [Bacula-users] Strange version numbers after upgrade

2007-11-20 Thread Markus Schweitzer
Hi, I have found my mistake. I had a second server to test the upgrade running in the same network as the primary bacula server. The second server had an image of the primary server and was configured to connect to the director of the primary. Therefore, I got the old version number of the pri

Re: [Bacula-users] Strange version numbers after upgrade

2007-11-13 Thread Markus Schweitzer
Hi, thank you for your answer. I will have a look tomorrow morning. Markus Falb schrieb: > On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:12:21 +0100, Markus Schweitzer wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I have upgraded my bacula on a server (Fedora Linux) from version >> 1.38.11 to 2.2.5. I have made a "configure, make, make insta

Re: [Bacula-users] Strange version numbers after upgrade

2007-11-13 Thread Markus Falb
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:44:58 -0500, Michel Meyers wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Markus Schweitzer wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Markus Falb schrieb: >>> try restarting the daemons. >> >> Thank you for your answer. >> >> I have tried to restart the daemons then I have reboo

Re: [Bacula-users] Strange version numbers after upgrade

2007-11-13 Thread Markus Falb
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:12:21 +0100, Markus Schweitzer wrote: > Hi! > > I have upgraded my bacula on a server (Fedora Linux) from version > 1.38.11 to 2.2.5. I have made a "configure, make, make install" to the > location of my 1.38.11 as recommended in the manual. After that, I have > upgraded th

Re: [Bacula-users] Strange version numbers after upgrade

2007-11-13 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Markus Schweitzer wrote: > Hi! > > Markus Falb schrieb: >> try restarting the daemons. > > Thank you for your answer. > > I have tried to restart the daemons then I have rebooted the server but > there is no change. > > Markus. How did you install

Re: [Bacula-users] Strange version numbers after upgrade

2007-11-12 Thread Markus Schweitzer
Hi! Markus Falb schrieb: > try restarting the daemons. Thank you for your answer. I have tried to restart the daemons then I have rebooted the server but there is no change. Markus. - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Sp

Re: [Bacula-users] Strange version numbers after upgrade

2007-11-12 Thread Markus Falb
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 23:12:21 +0100, Markus Schweitzer wrote: > Hi! > > I have upgraded my bacula on a server (Fedora Linux) from version > 1.38.11 to 2.2.5. I have made a "configure, make, make install" to the > location of my 1.38.11 as recommended in the manual. After that, I have > upgraded th

[Bacula-users] Strange version numbers after upgrade

2007-11-12 Thread Markus Schweitzer
Hi! I have upgraded my bacula on a server (Fedora Linux) from version 1.38.11 to 2.2.5. I have made a "configure, make, make install" to the location of my 1.38.11 as recommended in the manual. After that, I have upgraded the database with the script. Problem: When I apply the parameter --ver